They’re everywhere
BuzzFeed published a story the other day on the secret life of Breitbart – specifically about its “legion of secret sympathizers in Silicon Valley, Hollywood, academia, suburbia, and everywhere in between.”
“I have said in the past that I find humor in breaking taboos and laughing at things that people tell me are forbidden to joke about,” Yiannopoulos wrote in a statement to BuzzFeed News. “But everyone who knows me also knows I’m not a racist. As someone of Jewish ancestry, I of course condemn racism in the strongest possible terms. I have stopped making jokes on these matters because I do not want any confusion on this subject. I disavow Richard Spencer and his entire sorry band of idiots. I have been and am a steadfast supporter of Jews and Israel. I disavow white nationalism and I disavow racism and I always have.”
Notice what he doesn’t disavow – notice and be wearily unsurprised. He hates women and loves to harass them and encourage others to harass them. That of course is mainstream and fine, so no need to say he’ll stop making jokes about it.
Breitbart puffed Milo up.
And for thousands of people, Yiannopoulos, Breitbart’s poster child for offensive speech, became a secret champion.
Aggrieved by the encroachment of so-called cultural Marxism into American public life, and egged on by an endless stream of stories on Fox News about safe spaces and racially charged campus confrontations, a diverse group of Americans took to Yiannopoulos’s inbox to thank him and to confess their fears about the future of the country.
He heard from ancient veterans who “binge-watched” his speeches on YouTube; from “a 58 year old asian woman” concerned about her high school daughter’s progressive teachers; from boys asking how to win classroom arguments against feminists; from a former NASA employee who said he had been “laid off by my fat female boss” and was sad that the Jet Propulsion Lab had become “completely cucked”; from a man who had bought his 11-year-old son an AR-15 and named it “Milo”; from an Indiana lesbian who said she “despised liberals” and begged Yiannopoulos to “keep triggering the special snowflakes”; from a doctoral student in philosophy who said he had been threatened with dismissal from his program for sharing his low opinion of Islam; from a Charlotte police officer thanking Yiannopoulos for his “common sense Facebook posts” about the shooting of Keith Lamont Scott (“BLUE LIVES MATTER,” Yiannopoulos responded); from a New Jersey school teacher who feared his students would become “pawns for the left social justice campaign”; from a man who said he had returned from a deployment in “an Islamic country” to discover that his wife was transitioning and wanted a divorce (subject line “Regressivism stole my wife”); from a father terrified his daughter might attend Smith College; from fans who wanted to give him jokes to use about fat people, about gay people, about Muslims, about Hillary Clinton.
He also heard, with frequency, from accomplished people in predominantly liberal industries — entertainment, tech, academia, fashion, and media — who resented what they felt was a censorious coastal cultural orthodoxy. Taken together, they represent something like a network of sleeper James Damores, vexed but silent for fear of losing their jobs or friends, kvetching to Yiannopoulos as a pressure valve. For Yiannopoulos, these emails weren’t just validation, though they were obviously that. They sometimes became more ammunition for the culture war.
Sleeper James Damores. It sounds oddly familiar.
“I’m a relatively recent ex-lefty who received deep liberal indoctrination via elite private schools (Yale and Andover),” wrote one film editor who introduced herself as an “Undercover ‘pede in Hollywood.” (“Centipede” is slang for an online Trump supporter.) “I’ve been deeply closeted thus far due to the severe personal and professional repercussions of not beating the progressive drum.”
In an email titled “Working for E! Is Hell,” a production manager at the cable network wrote Yiannopoulos that her employer was a “contributor to the fake news machine and my colleagues have become insufferable. … I … offer you my services … a partner in fighting globalism.”
And so on.
A Twitter software engineer who felt betrayed by the “moral company” he had worked for since 2012, when it “stood for free speech,” emailed to tell Yiannopoulos that the removal of his verification in early 2016 “was obviously politically motivated.”
And some of these disgruntled tech workers reached beyond the rank and file. Vivek Wadhwa, a prominent entrepreneur and academic, reached out repeatedly to Yiannopoulos with stories of what he considered out-of-control political correctness. First it was about a boycott campaign against a Kickstarter with connections to GamerGate. (“These people are truly crazy and destructive. … What horrible people,” wrote Wadwha of the campaigners.) Then it was about Y-Combinator cofounder Paul Graham; Wadwha felt Graham was being unfairly targeted for an essay he wrote about gender inequality in tech.
…
In addition to tech and entertainment, Yiannopoulos had hidden helpers in the liberal media against which he and Bannon fought so uncompromisingly. A long-running email group devoted to mocking stories about the social justice internet included, predictably, Yiannopoulos’s friend Ann Coulter, but also Mitchell Sunderland, a senior staff writer at Broadly, Vice’s women’s channel. According to its “About” page, Broadly “is devoted to representing the multiplicity of women’s experiences. … we provide a sustained focus on the issues that matter most to women.”
“Please mock this fat feminist,” Sunderland wrote to Yiannopoulos in May 2016, along with a link to an article by the New York Times columnist Lindy West, who frequently writes about fat acceptance. And while Sunderland was Broadly’s managing editor, he sent a Broadly video about the Satanic Temple and abortion rights to Tim Gionet with instructions to “do whatever with this on Breitbart. It’s insane.” The next day, Breitbart published an article titled “‘Satanic Temple’ Joins Planned Parenthood in Pro-Abortion Crusade.”
Sunderland was fired – but I’m seeing people saying Vice’s “surprise” is an infuriating joke.
And the former Slate technology writer David Auerbach, who once began a column “Gamergate must end as soon as possible,” passed along on background information about the love life of Anita Sarkeesian, the GamerGate target; “the goods” about an allegedly racist friend of Arthur Chu, the Jeopardy champion and frequent advocate of social justice causes; and a “hot tip” about harsh anti-harassment tactics implemented by Wikipedia. Bokhari followed up with an article: “Wikipedia Can Now Ban You For What You Do On Other Websites.”
There’s a lot more.
It’s Trump’s world and we’re living in it.
Terrified his daughter would go to Smith? My wife is a Smithie!
(Yes, the whole sorry list of baffling fear and aggrievement is awful.)
It’s interesting how these people think they’re being silenced, but all we ever seem to hear is their opinions! I think they’re like the Christians in ancient Rome (and now) who were being “tortured” every time the government decided to allow tolerance of other points of view. For many of these people, being silenced isn’t what we would think of as being silenced – if others can speak, and others can disagree with them, then they are silenced. If they are mocked, that is “political correctness run amok” but if they mock others, that is “brave heroes”. If their boss fires them because their outspoken “values” are harming the company, then they are a martyr to political correctness.
They have the White House, both houses of Congress, and the Supreme Court. They have the conservative stations on the air waves, and so-called liberal stations running so scared that they make sure to include their voices and suggest we should empathize with them. They have a significant chunk of the church community. They have a significant chunk of the business community. All of these places their voices are heard – from the boardroom to the bedroom, they are affecting how all of us have to live. But when we try to carve out even a small chunk of the landscape for us, or when we try to assert that people who do not look like them, sound like them, or think like them have rights, they are being silenced.
They are the loudest silenced group I have ever heard.
Trump’s world certainly seems to have brought a bubbling undercurrent of paranoia and hatred to the surface. Monkey see, monkey do.
iknklast, Michelle Goldberg made a similar observation in Kindom Coming – The Rise of Christian Nationalism:
One example that stikes me as particularly revealing is the way they keep framing opposition to gay marriage (which is all about them denying the rights of others) as a defense of traditional marriage. As if anybody had ever suggested denying straight people the right to marry. Again we see that the discrimination they shout about is just rigthwing newspeak for anything that doesn’t discriminate against the people they hate.
Bjarte, the most sickeningly honest answer I’ve seen to the question of opposition to same-sex marriage came from the blog of a high-up in the Christian Patriarchy / Quiverfull movement (the most (in)famous of which are the Duggars) in a postscript to an article on his daughter’s wedding. He’s explaining why the ‘wedding’ wasn’t done in compliance with the state laws, ie no licence was applied for or issued (meaning the marriage is not recognised in law).
https://nogreaterjoy.org/articles/the-wedding/
@Bjarte Foshaug:
It would appear that may fundagelicals really believe that there are hordes of people who are refraining from being gay simply because they would not be able to legally marry the person they love. So when gay marriage becomes legal, it Opens the Floodgates.