Self-interest pretending to be expertise
Speaking of Ivanka Trump’s pretensions to being a supporter of women’s “empowerment” and a legitimate senior adviser to a head of state – she endorses Trump’s intervention on the equal pay front.
The Trump administration, with the backing of first daughter Ivanka, has suspended a policy proposed by President Obama that would have made it easier for women and people of color to identify whether they were being paid less than white male counterparts at work.
Under the scheme, private employers with over 100 workers would have had to disclose pay data to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on top of information on gender, race, and ethnicity already provided to the agency.
The policy was intended to help close the pernicious gender wage gap, which sees women and people of color paid far less than white men for the same jobs.
Ivanka Trump, who has built a brand off the claim that she supports working women, issued a statement supporting the move by the Office of Management and Budget.
“Ultimately, while I believe the intention was good and agree that pay transparency is important, the proposed policy would not yield the intended results,” said the first daughter, who recently published a book called ‘Women Who Work’ and markets a clothing and accessories line to working women.
How the hell does she know? Who is she to make that claim? What is the source of her expertise?
Activists who focus on pay equality have blasted this decision, with the executive director of Make It Work, a nonprofit aimed at improving women’s economic lives, calling it “a blatant attack on women.”
“To suspend a crucial Obama-era initiative aimed at increasing pay transparency and reducing the gender and racial pay gap is an unacceptable and deliberate attack on women in the workplace, especially black and Hispanic women who are currently paid only 63 cents and 54 cents to the dollar white men are paid, respectively,” said Tracy Sturdivant, who cofounded the Make It Work campaign.
But Ivanka Trump knows better because…what?
Oh wait, I know – it’s because she’s an employer and a purchaser. She doesn’t want to pay her employees more and she doesn’t want to pay more for the merch she sells. It’s not that she actually thinks it wouldn’t work; she’s lying just like Daddy about that – it’s that she thinks it will cost her money.
The CEO of the nonprofit National Women’s Law Center called the decision to halt the pay data disclosure initiative a “tremendous setback.”
“What they have said is that they thought this was ‘burdensome,'” said Fatima Goss Graves, who leads the organization aimed at advancing women’s equality. “That language has been used to halt all progress on civil rights — it’s not a new term.”
Goss Graves added that Ivanka Trump’s support of the administration’s move “entirely blows up the notion that she’s a champion of women’s issues.”
To put it mildly.
You cannot be pro women’s equality (or racial equality, basis human decency etc.. etc..) and pro Donald Trump at the same time. It’s as simple as that.
Yes, it is.
And, it isn’t necessary that a child be on their father’s team if they run for President. They can love their father as a father, and still not support him as a politician. History has other instances of that, for example, Ronald Reagan. Nowadays, though, it seems like somehow a politician is required to line up his/her entire family and demonstrate that they are marching in lockstep (or should that be goosestep) behind them. Part of that damn ideological purity thing. If even your kids don’t agree with you…well, I don’t agree with very much that my dad believes, but I can still love him as a father. Why can’t people see that?
Most people can see that love and respect aren’t contingent on total agreement and sycophancy. Then again, most people aren’t authoritarian narcissists.
Sheesh. And notice that we are to a point where the whole conflict of interest aspect is so routine it’s just alluded to in passing. We’ve got more cause for outrage, fresh cause, daily, than we have attention span.
Jeff Engle;
With any other politician, the conflicts of interest would be career-ending, but with Trump, who brings so much more that is even worse to the table, the conflicts of interest are a sidebar or footnote. The US will have to find a way to keep this from happening again before they elect a fascist who is smarter and more ruthless in the execution of his or her power play. We’re actually lucky that Trump is a lazy idiot instead of an indefatigable zealot. Trump was a toad in toad’s clothing whose horribleness was on display for years. As hard as it is to believe, someone better at dissembling, deceit and strategic camouflage of their true colours could cause more damage still.
Think Paul Ryan. Scott Walker. Ted Cruz…
[…] I did comment on Princess Ivanka’s ludicrous self-serving “statement” at the time: […]