It was frankly unbelievable
Fran and Dan Keller are out of prison, after 21 years.
Among the atrocities that Frances and Dan Keller were supposed to have committed while running a day care center out of their Texas home: drowning and dismembering babies in front of the children; killing dogs and cats in front of the children; transporting the children to Mexico to be sexually abused by soldiers in the Mexican army; dressing as pumpkins and shooting children in the arms and legs; putting the children into a pool with sharks that ate babies; putting blood in the children’s Kool-Aid; cutting the arm or a finger off a gorilla at a local park; and exhuming bodies at a cemetery, forcing children to carry the bones.
Hm. Something a bit off there? Wouldn’t that kind of thing be noticed rather quickly? So quickly that no one could actually do all of it? Even if anyone wanted to do all of it, which seems…unlikely
It was frankly unbelievable—except that people, most importantly, a Texas jury, did believe the Kellers had committed at least some of these acts. In 1992, the Kellers were convicted of aggravated sexual assault on a child and each sentenced to 48 years in prison. The investigation into their supposed crimes took slightly more than a year, the trial only six days.
Hm. Seems a bit off. You’d think the weirdness of many of the charges would hint that the others might be unreliable too.
Anyway they’re out now, because the doctor who testified at their trial recanted his testimony.
The Keller case is typical of the satanic ritual abuse panic and the dozens of cases that popped up in breathless media reports. The trouble started when Christy Chaviers, a 3-year-old girl who was an infrequent visitor to the day care during the summer of 1991, told her mother that Dan had spanked her. With coaxing from her mother and her therapist, Donna David-Campbell, whom Christy had been seeing to deal with acting-out issues, an incident of spanking turned into something much worse—Dan Keller, the little girl said, had defecated on her head and raped her with a pen. From there, the stories Christy told David-Campbell became wilder: The Kellers “had everyone take off their clothes and had a parrot that pecked them in the pee-pee,” they made her smoke a cigarette, they “came to her house with a chainsaw and cut her dog Buffy in the vagina until it bled.” David-Campbell concluded not that Christy was an imaginative child having trouble with her parents’ divorce, but that she was the victim of ritual abuse.
Hm. Doesn’t law enforcement normally recognize that very young children can’t tell the difference between fantasy and reality?
The panic began in earnest with the McMartin Preschool trial, an investigation that began 30 years ago. The owners of a California preschool and several teachers were accused of molesting a 2½-year-old boy; before it was over, hundreds of children, usually after lengthy sessions with coercive therapists, came forward to say that they, too, had been taken to a church to watch the beheading of a baby, then forced to drink its blood or flown by plane to random cities for sexual abuse, or countless other bizarre stories.
While that investigation and trial unfolded, other cases surfaced. Media poured attention on the claims, which made great fodder for a newly created 24-hour news cycle (CNN Headline News launched in 1982). As televangelists prayed for deliverance from Satan’s scourge, talk show “experts” claimed that every imaginable form of abuse was happening on a massive scale in America and that networks of Satanists had infiltrated schools, the police, and local government.
Now that was “fake news” if you like.
“It sounds laughable,” says Debbie Nathan, an investigative reporter who co-wrote Satan’s Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making of a Modern American Witch Hunt about the panic and is now a director for the National Center for Reason and Justice, which took up the Kellers’ cause. But there is certainly historical precedent, going back even further than the Salem witch trials: Ancient Romans, for example, claimed that Christians ate babies; Christians later claimed that Jews used Christian babies’ blood in religious rituals.
“Children symbolize the good things about culture, the innocence and purity, the future of the culture,” says Nathan. When a culture feels under threat in some way, fear and anxiety focus on the safety of children. America was experiencing upheavals in gender roles, child-rearing practices, and social expectations, and more and more people were embracing fundamentalist religion and belief in the devil. The fear of satanic ritual abuse was perpetuated by both ends of the political spectrum. “In the right wing, you had that kind of preoccupation with Satan, and on the left, you had a lot of concern with the well-being of children, and women going back to work, and I think it was a perfect storm of fear and anxiety,” says Nathan. Most if not all of those involved believed they were acting in the best interests of the children—which meant that any healthy skepticism was interpreted as anti-child.
We’re seeing that again.
Though satanic ritual abuse cases are virtually unheard of now, the panic hasn’t entirely subsided. A number of groups and people still very much believe in satanic and other ritual abuse; Randy Noblitt, the expert witness called by the prosecution in the Kellers’ trial, is one of them (and he’s still on faculty at Alliant International University).
Even if most of us don’t believe Satan is lurking in day care centers, we’re not immune to the panic people felt. Nathan points to the outsize concern (disproportionate to their rarity) over child “predators” or the epidemic of teen sexting as potential modern panic candidates: “One of the hallmarks of a panic is that you don’t realize it’s a panic when you’re in the middle of it.”
Well, some of you do.
Gosh, some 20 years ago PBS ( I think) aired a documentary on supposed child molester/satanists who’d operated a day care in North Carolina called ‘The Little Rascals’ . The documentary makers followed those involved in the trial over several years. The children ‘reported’ that their minders had sexually abused them and had even flown about on brooms.
Satan panic ensued.
As time went on, the facts became more and more outrageous, but since the police and authorities had decided from the get-go that all were guilty, many people ended up behind bars. They were all eventually exonerated ( one girl charged was only 18 ) but their lives, careers, finances and futures were all but ruined.
Basically, it was a witch trial…three centuries after those in Salem.
As Kipling (almost) said: If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs, you have no idea how serious shit is getting!
Also, ‘expert witness’ always sounds to me as though it refers to a witness expert in being a witness; somebody at the top of their game in saying what the lawyers want them to say.
Horrible, horrible beyond words.
Let’s hope the Kellers get a ginormously generous settlement, to some significant degree paid by those media, sects and the so-called doctor witness. I’m dreaming beeellions here, folks.
We had a couple of such crazy cases in peaceful Sweden too, if you can believe it.
— TRIGGER ALERT ! ! ! — Seriously.
One was the murder of a prostitute, Catrine d’Acosta, whose dismembered remains were found in the 80’s. Nobody was ever convicted of killing her, but two medical doctors were charged with it, later aquitted of that but convicted for the lesser crime of disrespectfully dismembering her body post mortem, which jail time was already served in custody. The court commented – in a side slur, which made it immune to appeal – that they probably were in fact guilty of the murder too, except that that could not be proved. So they lost their license and got into taxi driving – until word spread who they were, and the company lost enough goodwill to feel compelled to fire them.
The linchpin testimony came several years after the crime, from a small girl, daughter of one of the men, who had been about 2 when she – counselled by her divorced mother and an up-and-coming psycho-whatever – testified how Dad and “the uncle” had used a power drill to remove a woman’s head one weekend at the morgue where they worked. (My own first dateable reminiscence is from age about 2½. Without coaching or prodding.)
Obviously, neither I nor anyone else knows the actual truth, but either they are guilty and should be imprisoned for life, or they are not – in which case they fell foul of a justice assassination or whatever the correct term is.
It ought not have been so hard for the court to dismiss testimony from a minor, two years old at the time of observation and several years later, after considerable coaching by shall we say not entirely disinterested parties. But the theory of hidden trauma and repressed memories was rampant at the time, filling every newspaper every week at least.
—
Next case: “Thomas Quick”. A gay drug addict and minor criminal, born in a large family of Pentecostals in a small town in Dalecarlia, badly fumbled a bank heist taking hostage because he was recognised in spite of his simple disguise. Badly in mental disarray, he was locked into the “safe” psycho hospital Säter upon conviction. Time: late 80’s or so.
Already too long story shorter: He needed diazepams badly. His doctor was in touch with an “in” psychatrist, Margit Norell, who as it turned out ran the whole joint by remote network from Stockholm and was very much into the theory of repressed childhood memories. As it also turned out, one of her understudies had actually co-authored an important study in that field (Canadian, as I recall), completely denouncing that popular theory, but quickly turned around 180 and adopted it instead. Good carreer move; not so good for the clinic and patients, particularly “Thomas Quick”.
Badly suffering from abstinence as he was locked up, Quick picked up that he could get drugs for confessions and “repressed memories” from childhood – the more bizarre the better. And they were plenty bizarre, trust me! Not entirely stupid, he also picked up details of some unsolved murders to which he gradually confessed, applauded by the psychs who fed him ever more of the stuff. The police and even his own attorney happily coached him stumbling around “scenes” and suggested what might be buried where.
Those “serial” murders were unique in the history of crime in that the MO was totally inconsistent. Victims were young boys, young girls, an adult couple in a tent and a gay guitarist, among others, killed by various methods in their own garden, in the woods, in a populated suburb, or in their bath. He never really knew his way around the “scenes” and he got the description of the victims completely wrong more times than not; perhaps understandable as he was given an unlimited supply of drugs and was hardly able to walk. Norwegian police even drained a small lake and sifted the entire bottom searching for the bones of a girl but found none. But, he got his highs for many years.
He was convicted for eight murders, entirely on confession – never one shred of physical evidence.
An investigative reporter took on his story, wrote a bestselling book, arranged for new legal council, got him into detox at another clinic and after decades of incarceration he was finally allowed appeal, aquitted and released. Alas, the reporter succumbed to cancer before all of this had happened.
“Thomas Quick” wrote a book too and now lives under his own name, probably waiting for damages due. As a pensioner with no working life behind him, he can certainly use some honest money.
So, Sweden is now short one sensational serial killer and a large number of unknown, uncaught murderers. Plus whatever “Quick” will cash out eventually in damages. The prosecutor, police officers, and his original worse than useless attorney are retired. Margit Norell is deceased. Some other psycho-medics may still be active. Säter is still a “secure” hospital for the criminally insane, or whatever the PC term may be now. For my own part, I might reserve that epithet for some of those responsible for “Quick”‘s “care”.
THE END
(The gist is true although some details may suffer from my foggy memory of these events too ghastly to recall.)
(Also, apologies for once joking about how to fix a Windows computer you need one virgin and two cockerels, to a Methodist. But he did laugh.)
Google is your friend, John. (I remember seeing that too. Around the same time I read Elizabeth Loftus’s The Myth of Repressed Memory.)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/innocence/etc/other.html
What’s past is present: PZ Myers has the story here. How many years will the pizza vendor serve until the authorities dig up that nonexistent basement?
Yes, that Loftus! Her co-author was professor S Å Christiansson.
AoS, as a person who does expert witness work in a specialised field I could grumble. Sadly I’ve seen ‘experts’ I’ve been none too impressed with.
Back to satanic abuse cases at preschools, we had one of these in my town. Good grief. Half the population were convinced it was true, the other half stared at the unfolding shambles in disbelief. The end result was that all the female staff were found not guilty, but the sole male staff member was found guilty. Long story short the whole thing was an unbelievable shambles that ruined lives. As so often happens though, there is no political or judicial will to admit that is so.
I actually met a young social worker shortly after the first trial who was not involved with interviews, but worked with some of those who were. She was convinced that the guy was guilty. Kept saying “children don’t lie”. I still shake my head in disbelief at that.
People who say that either have never had children, or have managed to overcome a lot of cognitive dissonance.
@#8 inknklast: And/or have not encountered the so called president beep-beep. ;)
During that era there was a day care case in a small town in Alberta. Coached by police interviewers, the kids revealed a bizarre (and, of course, wildly unlikely) list of goings-on.
Little kids don’t lie? Well, not as such, but below a certain age they just can’t tell the difference. I know this personally because our sons were small at about that time, and I actually had occasion to test it one day. Some incident had happened (I don’t recall what) that I hadn’t seen, so I asked one of them, “Did X happen?” The reply was a cheerful “Yes Daddy!”. I thought: that was just a little too glib, so I rephrased it as “Did not-X happen?”. And got an equally cheerful “Yes Daddy!”, apparently oblivious to the fact that he’d just said the opposite 30 seconds earlier. From then on I was very careful to phrase questions in a way that actually elicited information, not just invited assent. And I knew how much faith to have in stories like this.
Rob, sounds like you may be from Christchurch. Lynley Hood’s “A City Possessed” is an excellent expose of the horror inflicted against Peter Ellis.
It is a stain on New Zealand that although there has been recognition that case was p[oorly handled and changes have been made, Ellis’ conviction still stands.
There was an argument at the time that went something like: if children describe sexual molestation in detail then they’re telling the truth because [I forget – I guess because how else would they be able to describe it?] I remember sort of assenting to that claim, because the people who said it sounded as if they knew…until I started learning how much [mostly unconscious] coaching there was.
@Ophelia
It all happened at the same time that feminists and others were speaking out about the reality of child abuse, sexual and otherwise, and challenging Freudian theory (which suggested that children commonly fantasize about sex with their parents and are rarely or never to be believed when they complain of sexual abuse). Alice Miller’s books were big, and though she warned about adult coaching and “recovered” memories, she was pretty big on believing children. People remembered the part about “children get abused and you should not discount what they say” and forgot the caveats.
A perfect storm indeed. And hey, horrendous abuse by evil strangers is much more titillating, and easier to deal with, than facing the reality of child abuse within families, perpetrated by ordinary people who may be flawed but are not easily Otherized.
@13: I recall, c.1993, one of the false-memory researchers came to speak at my university. The Womyn’s Centre picketed the event and shut it down, because, well you’re always supposed to believe victims, period. Of course, we now know that fabricated memories are a real thing, specifically in these kinds of cases. Not one of feminism’s shining moments, really.
David Brindley, yes and indeed. Even before Hood published her book there was a huge degree of disquiet and outright disbelief that the accusations, and then conviction, were sound. The interview techniques were appallingly contaminated. reasoning behind the ‘proof’ was circular. The lead police investigator allegedly had a series of sexual liaisons with mothers of children and even one of the social workers involved. Allegations from the children resulted from outright coaching and leading questions and involved elements that were fantasy (underground dungeons) to easily disprovable (use of a car that didn’t exists and where the alleged perpetrator didn’t drive anyway). Some of the allegations had timelines that were months before (and after) the man in the centre of the case even worked there.
It has to be said the NZ police are generally very good. If you ever need help they will provide it. if you’re a bad person they will attempt to bring you to justice. However, there have been a sequence of high profile cases through the 60’s-80’s where forensic best practice was not followed and where investigators seemed to be more interested in proving a theory than following evidence. There have been proven injustices, disputed injustices and, one wonders, how many cases not solved at all because of this incompetence.
One of the flaws of the justice system is that after the first trial it ceases to be about any pretence of a search for truth and justice and becomes about law. if a bad decision is arrived at in a legal manner the Courts can’t/won’t do anything about it. politicians who could intervene usually will not, until they are sure the majority of the voting population are behind them. Instead they defend the justice system to the hilt.
One of the results of this satanic panic seems to have been that men pretty much left all forms of education below secondary school. It’s rare to see a man in education for kids under 13.
And at the same time that media, fundamentalist Christians, pseudo-feminist ‘therapists,’ and police were engaged in the escalating absurdity of Satanic witch hunting… The Catholic Church was actually functioning as an international conspiracy of child rapists and torturers.
I recall that an investigator speaking on the tube about the matter was told ahead of time that they’d be cut off if they mentioned priests.
Its a terrible reminder that the assumption that all accusations are valid is dangerous. Especially in cases like these when the original accusations were coerced, or buried under subsequent confabulation.