It is relevant to our common life together
You know…Obama made statements on incidents like the one in Olathe, Kansas. He made statements on mass shootings and on hate crimes; the Olathe shooting wasn’t a mass one (although I don’t know what the cutoff number is – maybe three should be enough) but it seems likely it was a hate crime. Maybe not; maybe there’s some story we don’t know of a quarrel between the shooter and the two Indian men he shot, and maybe the witness who said the shooter yelled “Get out of my country!” is lying or wrong. The crime is under investigation. But the reality is that whether it is or not, it at present certainly reeks of a hate crime, and people subject to that kind of hate crime are feeling threatened and upset. Some of them are friends of mine. Some of them are friends of mine from India or Bangladesh or Pakistan. That was the kind of situation in which Obama made statements, telling people who felt threatened that he gave a shit.
I looked it up. USA Today did a story on it last June, after the Orlando shootings.
It was at least the 14th time that President Obama spoke to the nation in the immediate aftermath of a mass shooting — and the sixth time within just the past year.
Obama himself has acknowledged that his remarks have become all too predictable. “Somehow this has become routine. The reporting has become routine. My response here, from this podium, has become routine,” Obama said last October, following the shooting at an Oregon community college.
USA Today excerpted several of the statements. Here’s from the one on the Roseburg, Oregon shootings:
“We talked about this after Columbine and Blacksburg, after Tucson, after Newtown, after Aurora, after Charleston. It cannot be this easy for somebody who wants to inflict harm on other people to get his or her hands on a gun.
“And what’s become routine, of course, is the response to those who oppose any kind of common-sense gun legislation. Right now, I can imagine the press releases being cranked out: ‘We need more guns,’ they’ll argue, ‘fewer gun safety laws.’ Does anybody really believe that? …
“And of course, what’s also routine is that somebody somewhere will comment and say, ‘Obama politicized this issue.’ This is something we should politicize. It is relevant to our common life together, to the body politic….
“I hope and pray that I don’t have to come out again during my tenure as president to offer my condolences to families in these circumstances. But based on my experience as president, I can’t guarantee that. And that’s terrible to say. And it can change.”
Guess who hasn’t said one fucking word about the shootings in Olathe.
Guess who didn’t say one fucking word about the mass shooting at the mosque in Québec.
Guess who just does not give a shit.
Fuck him.
There has to be some way of getting his whole administration removed from office, surely?
I can’t bring myself to believe that such a well-established democracy can be hijacked so easily and with so little resistance from those with the power to do something about it.
You’re quite right.
Also, there is this report of the white house dismissing the slain man’s family linking Trump’s rhetoric to the killing…
http://www.huffingtonpost.in/2017/02/24/absurd-to-link-shooting-of-indian-man-with-trumps-remarks-on-im/
Also, mass shooting, apparently there are multiple definitions, all for good reasons. But, yeah :-|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/02/26/we-have-three-different-definitions-of-mass-shooting-and-we-probably-need-more/
And if the skin colours of the victims and shooter had been reversed, you can bet Trump would have used it against the judiciary striking down his ban, even if the shooter had not come from any of the seven countries in question.