Cover up
The NSS points out that several schools in the UK are requiring girls to wear religious dress as part of their school uniform.
Girls in dozens of schools in England are forced to wear hijabs, according to National Secular Society research published in the Sunday Times today.
The NSS examined uniform policies on the websites of registered Islamic schools in England and found that girls potentially as young as four are instructed to wear the hijab as part of the official uniform policy.
Out of 142 Islamic schools that accept girls, 59 have uniform policies on their website that suggest a headscarf or another form of hijab is compulsory. This includes eight state-funded schools and 27 primary schools – three of which are state-funded.
In some cases the requirement is very explicit. At Feversham College in Bradford the policy states: “It is very important that the uniform is loose fitting and modest and that the hijaab is fitted closely to the head. The College uniform is COMPULSORY” (sic). Tayyibah Girls’ School in Hackney states: “The school is not willing to compromise on any issues regarding uniform.”
Girls at Al-Ihsaan Community College in Leicester are told they must wear either a “jilbaab or niqab.” The jilbaab is a long loose-fitting garment which covers the body except the hands, face and feet. Redstone Educational Academy in Birmingham includes the jilbaab as part of the compulsory uniform. Olive Secondary in Bradford says that girls’ faces “must be covered” outside.
Boys are people, and have freedom. Girls are objects, and have no freedom.
The NSS sent a letter.
Text of letter send to Justine Greening, Secretary of State for Education, Minister for Women and Equalities
We write with concerns that British school children are being forced to wear the hijab and other items of religious clothing whilst at school.
Our research indicates that girls as young as four are being made to wear the hijab as part of an official school uniform policy. The wearing of the hijab appears to be compulsory in eight of the 23 publicly funded Islamic schools that accept girls – including in three primary schools.
The majority of independent Muslim schools also require the hijab to be worn, including one school that further requires children’s faces to be covered outside of the school.
All schools have a duty to ‘actively promote’ individual liberty, to ensure young people leave school prepared for life in modern Britain.
In our view, the forcing of a child to wear the hijab, or any other item of religious clothing, is entirely at odds with this fundamental British value and with wider human rights norms on children’s rights. This conflict needs to be addressed.
We are further concerned that a number of non-Islamic schools appear to be acceding to fundamentalist pressure to incorporate the hijab into their uniform. Whilst we fully support efforts to allow children from Muslim backgrounds to better integrate, a desire to be ‘inclusive’ should not automatically lead to the accommodation of illiberal and repressive cultural norms.
Given the ‘justifications’ that lie behind so called ‘modesty’ codes, and its implicit sexualisation of children, we regard it as a matter of deep regret that so many schools are facilitating young girls being dressed in the hijab.
Whilst policies permitted the wearing of the hijab are so often framed in terms of choice and freedom, we urge you to recognise that this ‘freedom’ is often dictated by social pressure.
Education policy should empower girls and help them to make their own decisions once they are ready to do so. We therefore call on you to work alongside Ofsted to ensure that girls from Muslim backgrounds are supported to have free choices, rather than having so called ‘modesty’ codes imposed on them. No child should be obliged to wear the hijab, or any other article of religious clothing, whilst at school.
With regard to accommodations made by other schools, we urge you to issue guidance that makes it clear that a decision not to incorporate the hijab into a school uniform will be supported by the Government. The guidance should also make clear that the freedom to make accommodations to allow the wearing of the hijab does not extend to primary schools.
Stephen Evans, Campaigns Director, National Secular Society
Sara Khan, Director and Co-founder, Inspire
Amina Lone, Co-Director of the Social Action & Research Foundation
Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Journalist
Pragna Patel, director of Southall Black Sisters.
Gina Khan, Spokesperson, One Law for All
Yasmin Rehman, Women and Human Rights Activist
Iram Ramzan, Journalist
Zehra Zaidi, Director of Stand up, social activist and former Conservative PPC
I hope the minister takes it seriously.
Faith schools are an outrage even before they inevitably do something like this. It’s hard to think of a worse idea.
There are several Christian faith schools in my region who only stopped teaching creationism in biology class when they were outed in a TV documentary. No doubt they still teach creationism but are a bit more careful about it now.
The group’s website used to invite people to visit to see how they do things, interview the staff etc. I must have applied fifty times and never once got a reply.
This is an ongoing challenge the UK will no doubt meet in ways that preserve social cohesion.
To be honest, allowing young girls to be veiled is but a small, small price to pay when you think of the countless contributions Islam has made, and will continue to make, to the cultural épanouissement of the UK.
I hope I’m misunderstanding this. If it “only” means girls must be in bags when they’re outside at recess, that’s bad enough…
John @2, sarcasm I assume? If so, you need to be a bit clearer. If not, I’m boggling.
“To be honest, allowing young girls to be veiled is but a small, small price to pay….”
“Allowing”? Really?
Are you a young girl? If not, you don’t get a say. And if you are, you only get a say *for yourself*.
Yes it’s sarcasm. John used to comment regularly but he veered into rather annoying rants at me for not being harsh enough toward Islam, so his comments are now subject to approval and he doesn’t comment as often, which means readers are probably less familiar with his take than in the past – plus there’s the fact that “John” isn’t the most memorable handle he could have chosen. I see his address so I know who it is so I can tell it’s sarcasm.
If you feel the desire to fuck a four year old, the problem isn’t with how she’s dressed.
Yes it’s sarcasm
Not really. I fully expect that this probleme will be *resolved* by cowardly authorities employing just such cowardly language.
‘Celebrating diversity’ CAN most certainly involve supressing the rights of certain women/girls.
That doesn’t make it not sarcasm – the “small, small price to pay” would be an expression of approval if it weren’t sarcastic.