But the current president of the United States lies
David Leonhardt spells it out, starting with the stipulation that not all untruths are lies.
But the current president of the United States lies. He lies in ways that no American politician ever has before. He has lied about — among many other things — Obama’s birthplace, John F. Kennedy’s assassination, Sept. 11, the Iraq War, ISIS, NATO, military veterans, Mexican immigrants, Muslim immigrants, anti-Semitic attacks, the unemployment rate, the murder rate, the Electoral College, voter fraud and his groping of women.
He tells so many untruths that it’s time to leave behind the textual parsing over which are unwitting and which are deliberate — as well as the condescending notion that most of Trump’s supporters enjoy his lies.
So, what about Russia?
Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential campaign was an attack on the United States. It’s the kind of national-security matter that a president and members of Congress swear to treat with utmost seriousness when they take the oath of office. Yet now it has become the subject of an escalating series of lies by the president and the people who work for him.
As Comey was acknowledging on Monday that the F.B.I. was investigating possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign, Trump was lying about it. From both his personal Twitter account and the White House account, he told untruths.
A few hours later, his press secretary, Sean Spicer, went before the cameras and lied about the closeness between Trump and various aides who have documented Russian ties. Do you remember Paul Manafort, the chairman of Trump’s campaign, who ran the crucial delegate-counting operation? Spicer said Manafort had a “very limited role” in said campaign.
The House investigation will probably not be uncovering the truth behind Trump’s lies, because Republicans are in charge.
It fell to Adam Schiff, a Democratic representative from Southern California, to lay out the suspicious ties between Trump and Russia (while also hinting he couldn’t describe some classified details). Schiff did so in a calm, nine-minute monologue that’s worth watching. He walked through pro-Putin payments to Michael Flynn and through another Trump’s aide’s advance notice of John Podesta’s hacked email and through the mysterious struggle over the Republican Party platform on Ukraine.
“Is it possible that all of these events and reports are completely unrelated, and nothing more than an entirely unhappy coincidence? Yes, it is possible,” Schiff said. “But it is also possible, maybe more than possible, that they are not coincidental, not disconnected and not unrelated, and that the Russians used the same techniques to corrupt U.S. persons that they have employed in Europe and elsewhere. We simply don’t know, not yet, and we owe it to the country to find out.”
He was on Maddow’s show last night, and he’s my new favorite person. He’s a former prosecutor, so he has that forensic way of thinking that comes in so handy. He dissented from part of Maddow’s take, which she derived from Comey: the idea that the second documents dump was done “loudly” as opposed to covertly because the Russians wanted everyone to know they were doing it. Schiff offered a less dramatic interpretation as also plausible.
https://youtu.be/63kFJeswq_Y
Leonhardt concludes:
Comey, as much as liberals may loathe him for his 2016 bungling, seems to be one of the few public officials with the ability and willingness to pursue the truth. I dearly hope that Republican members of the Senate are patriotic enough to do so as well.
Our president is a liar, and we need to find out how serious his latest lies are.
So that we can get rid of him.
The Republicans have fallen in love with Russia, partially because it’s the kind of place that jails people for ” blasphemy”. They only wish they could follow suit.
The 2016 “bungling” was advertising, contrary to sound policy and the law, at the end of a presidential campaign, technically true information about an investigation that would certainly be interpreted as a smoking gun that would compromise, badly, one of the two candidates – where that smoking gun was nothing at all (i.e., no genuine fresh email wrongdoing by HRC), with no chance of that being cleared up successfully and fully before election day.
That does not indicate a willingness to pursue the truth. That indicates merely a canny ability to use the truth in pursuit of deception. He also seems canny enough to want to have (regain?) a reputation for solid, faithful public service, and – when necessary, under a spotlight – to use truth-telling to that end as well. And that’s good, really and truly – but it’s clearing only the lowest bar of adult professional responsibility. There’s no reason to make him out as some sort of hero for that, much as he may appear to be one compared to the rest of the Trump Misadministration.
Heck, it’s plausible that this is just a bid to keep Democrats from prosecuting him for the “bungling” when they’ve got the power to do so again, or trying to make up for what he did handing Trump the presidency now that it’s had time to sink in.
Yeah. I almost went into that but didn’t. But yeah – it seems highly likely that if Comey had not done that awful thing we would not now be saddled with this monstrous corrupt sadist as president. It’s not as if that’s a trivial matter.
“He tells so many untruths that it’s time to leave behind …. the condescending notion that most of Trump’s supporters enjoy his lies.”
Is it condescending if it’s the truth? His supporters DO enjoy his lies. I suppose pretending otherwise allows Leonhardt to tell himself that the problem is with one man instead of the American people.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1478154315536358/?type=3&theater
Great God Pan – my thoughts exactly. I am surrounded on all sides by Trump supporters, and they are loving every minute of it. They believe every lie, and they swallow what he says without caring if it’s true or not, because it’s what they believe. The idea that his followers are some sort of noble, honorable people who just want jobs has to, must, die. Until we are honest in acknowledging that there are some very unpleasant people in this country, we will not be able to figure out how to fix the mess those people got us into.
And if we continue to harp on Hillary’s ‘basket of deplorables’ comment as somehow being outside the bounds of political acceptability, we will miss the real nastiness that flowed from the other side, and we will miss the fact that most people I know who “decided” not to vote for Hillary because of that comment, or because she deleted e-mails, are in many cases searching for some PC reason not to vote for her, and will not admit the truth – they don’t like her because she is the kind of woman they don’t like. Misogyny, racism, and sheer nastiness are the qualities that drove Trump into the White House, not some perception that he was going to bring jobs to middle America.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1478198268865296/?type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1478205132197943/?type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1478223122196144/?type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1479460915405698/?type=3&theater