Becoming a stan
Paul Krugman on Trump the strongman:
In 2015 the city of Ashgabat, the capital of Turkmenistan, was graced with a new public monument: a giant gold-plated sculpture portraying the country’s president on horseback. This may strike you as a bit excessive. But cults of personality are actually the norm in the “stans,” the Central Asian countries that emerged after the fall of the Soviet Union, all of which are ruled by strongmen who surround themselves with tiny cliques of wealthy crony capitalists.
Americans used to find the antics of these regimes, with their tinpot dictators, funny. But who’s laughing now?
We are, after all, about to hand over power to a man who has spent his whole adult life trying to build a cult of personality around himself; remember, his “charitable” foundation spent a lot of money buying a six-foot portrait of its founder. Meanwhile, one look at his Twitter account is enough to show that victory has done nothing to slake his thirst for ego gratification. So we can expect lots of self-aggrandizement once he’s in office. I don’t think it will go as far as gold-plated statues, but really, who knows?
It already has gone that far, and beyond – all these Trump Towers cluttering up the planet are gigantic gold-plated statues. His current business is a matter of being paid millions by gullible developers for the use of his name on their buildings – his name is his only contribution, and they pay him millions for it. Can you get much more self-aggrandizing than that?
I know that many people are still trying to convince themselves that the incoming administration will govern normally, despite the obviously undemocratic instincts of the new commander in chief and the questionable legitimacy of the process that brought him to power. Some Trump apologistshave even taken to declaring that we needn’t worry about corruption from the incoming clique, because rich men don’t need more money. Seriously.
But let’s get real. Everything we know suggests that we’re entering an era of epic corruption and contempt for the rule of law, with no restraint whatsoever.
How could this happen in a nation that has long prided itself as a role model for democracies everywhere?
Several ways, no doubt, but without The Apprentice, it probably wouldn’t have happened.
The magic of The Apprentice works over here, too. Alan Sugar was made a Lord, for fucks sake. He gets to veto bills supported by a democratically elected government because…. I….don’t….know.
To be fair, Sugar might have been made a lord for selling inferior computers in the 80s or giving lots of money to a political party. It might not have had anything to do with The Apprentice at all.
latsot, the big difference between Trump and Sugar is that Sugar’s title (and later role of ‘business czar’ at the tail-end of Blair’s government) were handed him by the State. Nobody voted him into power.
@Acolyte: there are many other differences. Sugar isn’t very orange and as far as I know doesn’t have any nuclear weapons but he’s famous (to people of later generations than I) for being on The Apprentice. We didn’t vote for him, but don’t tell me he’d have been made a lord if he weren’t on that show. The Apprentice is apparently magic.
Magic indeed, latsot; the contestants seem to vanish without trace once each series ends.