Another pocket of infection
Hmm.
Senate investigators plan to question Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and a close adviser, as part of their broad inquiry into ties between Trump associates and Russian officials or others linked to the Kremlin, according to administration and congressional officials.
The White House Counsel’s Office was informed this month that the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, wanted to question Mr. Kushner about meetings he arranged with the Russian ambassador, Sergey I. Kislyak, according to the government officials. The meetings, which took place during the transition, included a previously unreported sit-down with the head of Russia’s state-owned development bank.
Ah. Previously unreported, eh. The head of Russia’s state-owned development bank, eh.
Until now, the White House had acknowledged only an early December meeting between Mr. Kislyak and Mr. Kushner, which occurred at Trump Tower and was also attended by Michael T. Flynn, who would briefly serve as the national security adviser.
Later that month, though, Mr. Kislyak requested a second meeting, which Mr. Kushner asked a deputy to attend in his stead, officials said. At Mr. Kislyak’s request, Mr. Kushner later met with Sergey N. Gorkov, the chief of Vnesheconombank, which the United States placed on its sanctions list after President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia annexed Crimea and began meddling in Ukraine.
Hm.
Mr. Kislyak’s contacts with Trump administration officials have proved problematic: Mr. Flynn was fired for misleading Vice President Mike Pence about the nature of the conversations he had with the Russian envoy, claiming he had not discussed the sanctions against Russia when communications intercepts showed he had.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions was forced to recuse himself from any Russian inquiries led by the Justice Department after he failed to disclose at his Senate confirmation hearing that he had met with Mr. Kislyak during the campaign.
I’m sensing a pattern here.
Mr. Gorkov is a graduate of the academy of Federal Security Service of Russia, a training ground for Russian intelligence and security forces. And as the head of Vnesheconombank, Mr. Gorkov presides over a bank whose supervisory board is controlled by members of Mr. Putin’s government, including Prime Minister Dimitri A. Medvedev. It has been used to bail out oligarchs favored by Mr. Putin, as well as to help fund pet projects like the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi.
Hm.
Mr. Kushner had not yet stepped aside as chief executive of Kushner Companies, his family’s real estate empire, which was trying to attract investment for the company’s crown jewel, an overleveraged Manhattan office tower on Fifth Avenue. The company was in the midst of negotiations to redevelop the building with Anbang Insurance Group, a Chinese company with ties to the Beijing government.
Senate investigators plan to ask Mr. Kushner if he discussed ways to secure additional financing for the building during his meeting with the Russian banker, a government official said.
Hm.
The extent of Mr. Kushner’s interactions with Mr. Kislyak caught some senior members of Mr. Trump’s White House team off guard, in part because he did not mention them last month during a debate then consuming the White House: how to handle the disclosures about Mr. Flynn’s interactions with the Russian ambassador.
Oh, he didn’t mention them then either. Intersting.
Ms. Hicks said that Mr. Trump had authorized Mr. Kushner to have meetings with foreign officials that he felt made sense, and to report back to him if those meetings produced anything of note. She said that because in Mr. Kushner’s view the meetings were inconsequential, it did not occur to him to mention them to senior staff members earlier.
Sure, that’s the right way to do things – casual as fuck. Just tell your son-in-law to go chat with foreign officials at his own discretion, and report back if there’s anything interesting. That’s how all of this works. Sure it is.
Don’t worry, the Hudson will clear out that swamp shortly.
Maybe double check the teacups.
I’m sure the writer would’ve prefered to say that it didn’t catch the Trump team off guard so much as it caught them with their pants down.
Slightly off topic, but I find it a bit frustrating that so many people seem to be insisting there’s no solid (enough) proof for coordinated foul play between Trump and the Russians and therefore the issue shouldn’t even be discussed. But there needn’t have been actual full on coordination. The Trumpettes are nothing if not greedy and they’re perfectly capable of engaging in some pre-election backroom wheeling and dealing if they think it’ll enrich them personally, and the Russian government is perfectly capable of making a note of that and deciding it wouldn’t hurt if they could tip the electoral scales a bit somehow. Regardless of who initiated the proceedings.
There’s no need for a fully fledged conspiracy to exist for people to break ethical and legal boundaries in pursuit of similar goals.
And as a person hailing from a country quite close to Russia, I’m rather annoyed at this pooh-poohing of Russia’s potential efforts to undermine democracy and gain influence abroad, but that’s another matter altogether.
https://www.facebook.com/144310995587370/photos/a.271728576178944.71555.144310995587370/1484599261558530/?type=3&theater
A bit off topic, but this is still bugging me:
Sessions didn’t “fail to disclose.” That makes it sound like they asked him, “Well? Anything else?” and he just kept his mouth shut.
Instead of failing to disclose, he lied when he volunteered that he had had no discussions with the Russians.
I think this is an important distinction. “Failed to disclose” makes it sound like a technicality, a lack of candor, an omission. What he did was affirmatively LIE.