Also excluded
The BBC was also excluded from Spicey’s informal press briefing yesterday.
The BBC, CNN, the New York Times and others were excluded from an audience with Press Secretary Sean Spicer, with no reason given.
Hey, dictators don’t have to give reasons.
Shortly after Mr Trump’s speech on Friday, a number of selected media organisations were invited into Mr Spicer’s office for an informal briefing, or “gaggle”.
Those allowed into the room included ABC, Fox News, Breitbart News, Reuters and the Washington Times.
When asked why some were excluded, Mr Spicer said it was his decision to “expand the pool” of reporters.
He also warned the White House was going to “aggressively push back” at “false narratives” in the news.
Which being interpreted means “at news stories they don’t like.”
The Associated Press, USA Today and Time magazine refused to attend as a protest.
The BBC’s bureau chief in Washington, Paul Danahar, said the BBC has a representative at every daily White House briefing and it was not clear why they were barred from Friday’s session.
Also not on the party list? The Guardian:
The “gaggle” with Sean Spicer, the White House press secretary, took place in lieu of his daily briefing and was originally scheduled as an on-camera event.
But the White House press office announced later in the day that the Q&A session would take place off camera before only an “expanded pool” of journalists, and in Spicer’s West Wing office as opposed to the James S Brady press briefing room where it is typically held.
Outlets seeking to gain entry whose requests were denied included the Guardian, the New York Times, Politico, CNN, BuzzFeed, the BBC, the Daily Mail and others. Conservative publications such as Breitbart News, the One America News Network and the Washington Times were allowed into the meeting, as well as TV networks CBS, NBC, Fox and ABC. The Associated Press and Time were invited but boycotted the briefing.
The outlier is the Daily Mail. I would expect to see them grouped with Fox News and the Washington Times, not the Guardian and CNN.
While prior administrations have occasionally held background briefings with smaller groups of reporters, it is highly unusual for the White House to cherry-pick which media outlets can participate in what would have otherwise been the press secretary’s televised daily briefing. The briefing has become indispensable viewing for journalists trying to interpret the often contradictory statements coming out of the Trump administration, and Spicer’s aggressive handling of the press and delivery of false or misleading statements have already been memorably mocked on NBC’s Saturday Night Live.
“Gaggles” – more informal briefings – with the press secretary are traditionally only limited to the pool when they conflict with the president’s travel, in which case they often take place aboard Air Force One. At times, impromptu gaggles form with reporters who spend their days in the White House, but denying outlets wishing to participate is extremely uncommon.
I think what they mean is it never happens, but they don’t put it that way so as not to have to defend it.
The White House – surprise! – lied about it.
Stephanie Grisham, a spokeswoman for the White House, said: “Claims that outlets were excluded are not factual.”
In a statement, she added: “The pool was there, so various media mediums were represented.” The pool is a system by which a small group of reporters take turns covering the president and share their reports of his activities with a larger group.
Contrary to Grisham’s statement, outlets who made requests to attend were told this would not be permitted.
When the Guardian asked to participate, pointing to its possession of a “hard pass” that grants daily entry to the White House, an official declined.
“No, unfortunately a hard pass does not necessarily guarantee entry into the gaggle,” Catherine Hicks, a junior White House press aide, emailed in response.
“The gaggle today is just today’s pool with the addition of a few others here at the White House.”
Some outlets lingered in the West Wing hallway out of frustration but were asked by a Secret Service agent, upon instructions from the White House press office, to leave the area.
So it’s a straight-up lie to say “Claims that outlets were excluded are not factual.”
Earlier on Friday, Trump continued his assault on the press in a speech before the nation’s largest gathering of conservative activists.
He said the press should not be allowed to use anonymous sources, a restriction on free speech he has not suggested before. “You will see stories dry up like you have never seen before,” Trump predicted.
“As you saw throughout the entire campaign, and even now, the fake news doesn’t tell the truth,” Trump said at CPAC.
“I say it doesn’t represent the people, it never will represent the people, and we’re going to do something about it.”
If they do, it will have to be via a fascist takeover.
Earlier this morning on MSNBC, a journalist whose name I didn’t make note of said that she watched a WH staffer at the door to Spicer’s office telling those seeking entrance who could enter and who couldn’t. When she stepped forward to ask for an explanation of the selection criteria, she said the staffer replied “You’re threatening me!” So much for “land of the free and home of the brave.”
Oh good god.
I like the use of “expanded” to mean “reduced”.
Also:
Yay for plurals!
Graham, maybe they’re using reduced in the most scientific way, in which a compound that is reduced GAINS electrons? But…they probably don’t know that so, no, they’re using it for the opposite of what it really means.
The proper response for the excluded media outfits should have been to post a headline saying, “Thank you, Mr. President, for freeing up our valuable reporters’ time from listening to your daily lies, so that they can, instead, do the actual job of journalism, which we are quickly remembering has nothing to do with ‘access’. Rest assured, our reporters will not be idle during your ‘gaggle’. Instead, they will be out, developing contacts, contacting sources, and otherwise working to ferret out the truth about both your administration and the effects of your policies.”