Those who participate in this “banter” are rewarded
Shaun Harper at the Washington Post says what we all know: that a lot of men do talk the way Trump talked on that tape.
At several moments throughout the campaign, I have felt that something about Trump was disturbingly familiar, but I couldn’t quite pinpoint it. After seeing the video of this presidential candidate and married man talking about kissing women, grabbing their vaginas and using his celebrity to get them to do whatever he wants, I now fully recognize the guy I have known since I was a teenage boy. The Trump on that video is a sexist, misogynistic, womanizing cheater who degrades and sometimes sexually assaults women. I know this man and so many like him. I wish I didn’t, yet I do, and I have for a long time.
Truth is, many men objectify women and say outrageously offensive things about their breasts, butts and other body parts in spaces we occupy with each other.
Of course they do. We know this. If we hadn’t known it before we would know it now thanks to Reddit and Twitter and 4chan and all the rest of the shitbrew.
In his response to the video’s release, Trump explained that his comments were “locker room banter.”
Which we already knew. We know it’s a thing; the point is that it’s a bad thing. Racist banter around the ol’ burning cross is a bad thing, and sexist banter in the locker room is also a bad thing. “Banter” isn’t a certification of non-toxicity.
And such talk is not confined to gyms and country club showers, but occurs too often in other spaces where men are among other men — in fraternity houses, on golf courses, in barbershops, at bars. I have even seen men stand aside and engage in this kind of talk about moms at kids’ birthday parties. Unfortunately, the kinds of words we heard from Trump are commonly spoken when men are with other men. Those who participate in this “banter” are rewarded. Those who choose not to engage, and especially guys who critique such statements, have their masculinities questioned and risk being placed on the outskirts of social acceptance.
And there’s no magic mechanism that makes that harmless or benign. If men have a lot of practice talking that way about women, they don’t stay magically untouched by it when they’ve left the locker room. Contempt for women is pervasive, and lately we’ve been making negative progress – it’s been getting worse instead of better. This is a bad thing.
I have spent much of my career studying men and their masculinities. My research has put me in conversation with thousands of young men, mostly high school and college students. Many have told me that they learned to be Trumps in middle school, sometimes earlier. Media, parents, family members and peers shape how boys are taught to think and talk about women from a young age. While I am quite [a lot] older than they are, I still understand and relate to what my research participants tell me. The horrifying things Trump said in that video are comments I’ve heard from male friends of mine since I was a teenager. As a young boy, I witnessed older men appraise women’s bodies and heard them say what they would do sexually (for example, “Look at the ass on that one” and “I would bang her all night long”). Truth is, I have known Trumps most of my life.
It’s common, he says. Men encourage it, he says. Men rarely challenge it, he says.
And because bragging of this kind is common, men in my research confess that they don’t always recognize that they and their peers talk about women in deplorable ways. Hiding it behind the guise of “banter” or jokes only makes the problem worse by making it seemingly acceptable. It is unacceptable.
Note the way Trump attempted to do exactly that when Anderson Cooper asked him about it last night – he said no it was just locker room banter. That “no” is meaningless. “Locker room banter” is not a magic passport. We already know it was “banter”‘; we heard the laughter. We heard the loud, knowing, sniggering laughter, and we saw the men get out of the bus seconds later and greet the woman they’d been sniggering about as if she were pretty much human. We saw the transition between dudeworld and the real world, where it wouldn’t quite do for Trump to grab a woman between the legs when she said hello to him. We know what “banter” excuses: not one god damn thing.
Now Harper gets to the difficult part.
When men fail to challenge other men on troubling things they say about and do to women, we contribute to cultures that excuse sexual harassment, assault and other forms of gender violence. I know from my research that confronting male peers is difficult for a 14-year-old high school student-athlete who desperately wants his teammates to like and accept him. He needs his coach to step up and disrupt locker room banter.
But what if the coach is just another Trump, or Billy Bush? And what are the chances that he isn’t?
But too many adult men fall short of this ourselves, especially when we are in “men’s only” spaces with guys whom we need to affirm our masculinities.
I am fairly certain that hearing the vulgar words Trump spoke over a decade ago will compel many more women to vote against him next month. Electing the first female president will not end sexism, though, any more than electing Barack Obama ended racism. To make progress, men need to do more than vote against Trump. We must stand up to him and call out others who say things similar to what we heard him say on the video. We have to stop excusing the disgusting degradation of girls and women as “locker room banter.” Feminists and courageous others have done much to contest exchanges like the one between Trump and Bush. But it takes men like me to hold our friends accountable for things they say and do to objectify women. We must challenge their values, language and actions.
It takes men to do it not because men are better at it or because women are too weak to do it, but because men are the people allowed into men-only spaces.
I have known Trumps far too long — they are my friends, my fraternity brothers and so many other men with whom I routinely interact. I understand now, more than ever before, that letting them talk this way about women makes me just as sexist. By excusing their words and actions, I share some responsibility for rape, marital infidelity and other awful things that men do. I want other men to recognize this, too — not only because they have mothers, wives, sisters, aunts or daughters – but because sexism hurts all women and men in our society.
It’s poisonous. We need it to stop.
And in the work place. And when the woman in question happens to hear it, when she reports it, when she asks for some kind of resolution (in my case, I merely asked to be transferred to a different module, an easy request to grant, and was denied)? When the woman reports it, she is told she should be flattered. Men are noticing her. She’s “hot”.
It never crosses anyone’s mind that maybe she is just trying to get her work done without being interfered with. Maybe she is a person, not a sexbot. Maybe she has feelings. Maybe she is incredibly disturbed by the sight of a woman supervisor sitting there telling another woman she should be “flattered” when she is sexually harassed. Because the woman supervisor was too scared (as the only woman supervisor) to step up to the plate and risk ostracism from her male supervisor.
Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck
i think Trump needs to come with trigger warnings.
It also takes men to do it because misogynists do not value women’s opinions. If a woman tells a man “Don’t talk about me that way,” it’s even funnier to talk about her that way, because she has no sense of humor and it’s funny to make women mad. If she says “Don’t grab me like that”, grabbing her again is a way to let her know she is powerless, that her “no” means nothing.
I’ve dealt with these guys, and they only respond to a credible threat: a lawsuit, the social disapproval of other men; or the possibility of actual physical damage.
Once, long ago and not so far away, when I was working in a state government bureaucracy I reported sexual commentaries and insults from my supervisor to the “human resources” department, in writing, as a grievance. And filed it. And received a call from HR for a meeting, where I was surprised to learn that I was considered “insubordinate” for filing that grievance – my supervisor had filed his own complaint against me – and told that two more insubordination complaints would result in my being fired.
I still can’t believe it. It was over 30 years ago and I STILL CANNOT BELIEVE IT. Of all the professional insults I have received, that one was the worst.
I quit well before I had the chance to meet my 3-insubordinations goal.
Good god.
My experience may not be representative (let’s hope!), but yeah, in the sample of the male population that I’ve been exposed to in my lifetime, this kind of talk and behavior is closer to the rule than the exception. This is one of the reasons I hardly even want a social life any more. It is so ubiquitous.
I’ve been wondering if I was just too young and clueless (I definitely was, but anyway) to notice how bad it really was back in the 80s and 90s. I know that much of the rock music I liked to listen to (*blush*) at the time had lyrics that could have been written by a gamergater or a convicted serial rapist. Still my (possibly mistaken?) impression was that this sort of thing was seen as less socially acceptable then than now. What happened?
4Chan. Twitter. Reddit. Run by men, for men, about men, with women being hounded until they throw up their hands and log off permanently.
#5
Yes, the abuse of power for sexual ‘gain’ is smack in the middle of this. Billy Bush’s job depends on making ‘nice’ with Trump. And the same is true of hundreds of women who have passed under Trump’s eye, and hands.
I don’t know how often other men have the opportunity to say ‘no’ to the presumption of collegial misogyny at work or social situations. When I’ve heard it, it has been out on the edge, a muttered phrase between guys I’ve never met or spoken with, an unheard whisper toward a passing woman.
A couple of months ago, a man in SF was stabbed nine times when he ASKED a street loiterer to stop harassing the woman he was walking with.