They don’t want the religious freedom monitored
And then there’s India. Reuters via the Guardian:
India has denied visas for a delegation from the US government agency charged with monitoring international religious freedom.
The delegation from the US Commission on International Religious Freedom had been scheduled to leave for India on Friday for a long-planned visit with the support of the US state department and the US embassy in New Delhi, but India had failed to issue the necessary visas, the commission said.
The Indian embassy in Washington hasn’t responded to a request for comment.
Last year, despite a much-heralded fresh start in US-India ties under Indian prime minister Narendra Modi, the United States ran into problems arranging visits by the head of its office to combat human trafficking and its special envoy for gay rights.
Well there’s your problem right there – Modi is a Hindu nationalist, not a secularist or a liberal. He doesn’t believe in religious freedom.
A state department official referred queries on the visa issue to the Indian government, but highlighted remarks by president Barack Obama on a visit to Delhi last year, in which he made a plea for freedom of religion in a country with a history of strife between Hindus and minorities.
In its 2015 report, the bipartisan USCIRF said incidents of religiously motivated and communal violence had reportedly increased for three consecutive years.
It said that despite its status as a pluralistic, secular democracy, India had long struggled to protect minority religious communities or provide justice when crimes occur, creating a climate of impunity.
Because it’s not really a pluralistic, secular democracy in practice.
Non-governmental organisations and religious leaders, including from the Muslim, Christian, and Sikh communities, attributed the initial increase in violence to religiously divisive campaigning in advance of the country’s 2014 general election won by Modi.
The report said that since the election, religious minorities had been subject to derogatory comments by politicians linked to Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party and numerous violent attacks and forced conversions by Hindu nationalist groups.
In that context, the withheld visas are not a big surprise.
Well, in that context maybe Mr Modi will get used to a reduced Most Favored State status commercially.
That’s not the only sinister development–“India’s sedition controversy”
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/asia/resources
India, the “world’s largest democracy”? Temporarily perhaps. There’s also a discussion on the podcast as to why the Indian government’s oppressive use of sedition laws don’t get any publicity in the West.