Maybe this time is Gone Girl in real life
Maybe he didn’t do it. Maybe that man you care about didn’t do that awful thing to the woman you don’t care about very much. Maybe this time, of all the times, is Gone Girl in real life and that man you like – the sports star one, or the actor one, or the musician one, I’m not going to specify – really is the victim of a vicious feminine plot to destroy him. After all, you’d know the real thing if you saw it, wouldn’t you? You’re no rape apologist. You’d never harbour liking or admiration for a man who was abusive or violent to women. We all know that this is at the core of your moral thinking, because you’ve been extremely careful to say so, explicitly, before declaring that this time – this one time – is different.
Of course. Absolutely. Because we human beings have an infallible goodness-detector – I think it’s up there somewhere near the prefrontal cortex – in our brains that has been demonstrated to work perfectly over all of human history. Well when I say “human beings” I of course mean men – women aren’t human beings, they’re human-other beings, or human-less-than beings – human-minus beings perhaps says it best. Women don’t have infallible anything, obviously, and they can never tell shits from the sweetest kindest gentlest guys you’ve ever known. But men have it, and women who listen to men can avail themselves of it.
I will let you in on a secret now. A sensational true fact about abusive men. Here goes: pretty much every man who has ever harmed a woman has been liked by someone. Even the ones who aren’t famous have someone to have a pint with. Extraordinary I know, but the ability to be popular with other men – or with other women – has never stood in pristine opposition to the ability to go home and shove your girlfriend against a wall, taking care to focus only on the parts of her body that will stay clothed and covered.
Wait – really? Are we sure? That’s disturbing, if so.
Because it’s not really about the fact that they’re talented or charming or successful. It’s about the fact that they’re men. There is a quiet conspiracy of power compelling us to preserve every crevice of doubt where a man’s reputation can hold on. It’s true that women are not believed when they come forward with allegations, but even the disbelief has an insultingly shallow quality – if her story becomes impossible to deny then the criteria for her dismissal can be easily changed, and the charge of “liar” replaced with one of “slut” or “gold digger” or “asking for it”. The reason women’s words count for so little is that women are counted for so little.
Because men could be football players or movie directors or tv stars. Women are just bleh. It’s too wasteful to throw away talented men just because they hit women.
Being liked is not just compatible with misogyny: misogyny can be the social code that cements the liking. Patriarchy would have fallen apart a long, long time ago otherwise. So maybe this time, this sports star or actor or musician didn’t do it. It’s possible. And maybe this time, like so many other times, she’s telling the truth. Maybe her life matters at least as much as his career and reputation. That is possible too.
Possible, but so very very unlikely.
One of the most insidious ideas I have encountered is the idea that if they have a wife, a family, friends, people who love them, or are nice to dogs, they can’t be doing bad things. I was reading a book where this guy gets an appointment to go meet someone who is a ruthless businessman. When he gets there, he finds that the guy has a family, and has adopted a young man to help him out. All of a sudden, any question about his ruthless tactics in business goes out the window; this can’t be that guy.
Somehow we think we’ll know. Somehow, we assume that bad guys are all like Ebenezer Scrooge, living a life of lonely wealthy, surrounded by people who hate you and that you hate, and that no one in the world could possibly live with or love that…ruthless…businessman. It clouds our judgment.
Which is all about this election thing – wanting to vote for the guy you would most like to have a beer with. I don’t give a damn about that myself. I know a lot of those guys could easily be jerks. I want to look at other things, but the “nice guy” story often clouds the issue. Especially when the issue is abuse of women.
Pet the Dog/Affably Evil/Villain with Good Publicity are things in real life as well.
“Maybe her life matters at least as much as his career and reputation.”
What utter nonsense! To think that a human life could be worth as much as a career! You must not be a very good capitalist. Even the most average of careers is worth at least 3-4 human lives, that’s why we maintain the worker drones. Don’t even get me started on a truly great (almost always man’s) career, those can be worth hundreds or even thousands of lives. Just ask Kenneth Lay or Donald Trump.
There’s a bizarre split between public resentment, ‘bro’ behavior, misogynist culture etc. and the practice of private and criminal violence. Is Andrew Dice Clay an abuser? I don’t know. We have (since retracted) claims that Donald Trump is.
The here unnamed celeb has a notorious history of reckless boozing and drugging. Which are near guarantees of dangerous, crude, behavior.
It should be a cliché by now that stalkers, abusers, rapists etc. operate by maintaining an effective ‘front’ that deceives their victims, their communities, law-enforcement etc. etc.
DeBecker’s ‘Gift of Fear’ should be required reading.