If not at a Center for Ethics, then where?
An item from Daily Nous:
Wednesday afternoon, Gordon Hull, associate professor of philosophy at University of North Carolina, Charlotte, and director of the school’s Center for Professional and Applied Ethics, put up a post on the Center’s webpage about the recent police shooting of an unarmed black man, Keith L. Scott (see the bottom of this post for that text).
The central message of the post was summed up in its conclusion:
I do not know exactly what happened last night, but even more than I hope that the CMPD will conduct a thorough and transparent investigation, I hope that something triggers white America to care about the deep structural racism that permeates so much of our society, and about the incalculable damage that racism does to real people, real families and real communities, every day.
The next morning Hull received an email from his dean, Nancy A. Gutierrez, ordering him to take the post off the site.
He did, and then he wrote about it at NewAPPS:
We live in a world where University Ethics Center directors are not allowed to attempt to exercise moral leadership in the communities they serve, even as those universities claim to commit and recommit to their communities. And where Ethics Centers are forced to be strangely silent on moral issues like HB2 and police violence.
Gutierrez told him he’s free to say whatever he wants elsewhere, but not at the university’s Center for Professional and Applied Ethics.
So he can profess and apply ethics any way he likes outside the university, but inside the university, where he directs a center for doing just that, he can’t. That seems perverse. It’s not the Center for Professional and Applied Ethics Within Certain Limits to be Determined by the Administration, at least not in the title. Surely professing and applying ethics as he thinks right is what he was hired for.
Back to Jason at Daily Nous:
It is not unreasonable to think that it’s well within the responsibilities of the director of a university ethics center to comment publicly, in that professional capacity, on ethical matters of current concern. To speak in that professional capacity is not to speak on behalf of the university. Rather, it is to make use of the expertise for which one was hired to express one’s professional opinion on a subject well within the scope of concern of the institution. If a school is going to bother having an ethics center, ought it not respect the academic freedom of its employees to speak to the public about ethics?
It certainly seems so to me. In fact it seems just a tad fraudulent to have a university ethics center if you’re not going to allow its staff to apply ethics without your oversight and control. UNC isn’t a “university” like Trump “University,” that’s just a fancy name for fleecing naïve customers – it’s a real university, which should act according to the ethics of academia.
H/t David Koepsell
Universities are terrified nowadays of losing alumni support. And the support they are most concerned about is those who tend to give the most money. Often these come from the Business College, where conservatism reigns supreme. (In all studies of the liberal bias of universities, they look only at liberal arts studies, and ignore the strong rightward leaning of the various business disciplines).
More and more academic freedom and quality of educational experience is being sacrificed to the almighty dollar.
Ach, god. And the Business degree is by far the most popular, if I’m not mistaken?
The school where I did my masters slipped in my mind when they caved to the demand of a donor that they censor an art exhibit. Students being told their art couldn’t be hung because it offended someone who walked through the building with their nose in the air, holding a fistful of cash in one hand and the leash of the university administration in the other. What lessons do those students learn? They learn that they will need to conform to a lifeless, commercial art if they want the chance to be seen, to work in the field they love.
I watched our local community theatre rewriting a play to take out the parts they worried would offend the local population. I sometimes catch myself hesitating in writing my own plays, wondering, if I write this, will anyone ever put it on? When I catch myself doing that, I slap myself on the wrist, go get a cup of hot coffee, roll up my sleeves, and write what I think needs to be written. Someday I may find someone with guts enough to tackle my women of the Bible series, or my piece that spits in the eye of our local masters of the universe.
And when I teach my class, I say the word “evolution” loud and proud. I refuse to go through life with my head down just because some donor doesn’t think we should teach actual science in the science classes. I hope I have the guts to continue to do that if they threaten to fire me just a few years before I am eligible to retire.
[…] a comment by iknklast on If not at a Center for Ethics, then […]
I was rather thrilled that my book on Accounting Ethics, and the overall approach of the class, was actually in favor of strong regulations as *the market runs on trust* and once shady dealings are normalized, trust breaks down, investment stops, and the economy tanks until a new mechanism of verification to restore trust is developed. Furthermore, Adam Smith was quoted on the importance of controlling corporations so that they do not become powerful enough to make their needs more important than the needs of society. The idea was that business should serve society, and make a profit in the process, not that society should serve business.
Quite the breath of fresh air.
This morning I was surprised to have a “letter of apology” in my box, from an online sewing site. Why were they apologizing? B/c they recently posted an article about sewing lingerie (something that a surprising number of sewistas take up b/c of fit and cost issues with store-bought underwear). And more than a few readers posted their objections to articles and images that were not “family friendly.” Jesus H christ – a goddamn SEWING site.
Reading about the university ethics center debacle made my blood run cold. What the FUCK IS WRONG WITH US?
Professor Hull forgot to include a call for an anti-Israel boycott.
Whereas you, John t D, would never miss such an opportunity? What, ethics?