Evidence on gender stereotyping in ads
In recent years, there has been increasing political and public debate on equality issues. The mocking of women and men in non-stereotypical roles, the reinforcement of stereotyped views of gender roles, and gender-specific marketing to children, as well as concerns regarding objectification, sexualisation and the presentation of an idealised or unrealistic body image are all issues that have gained considerable public interest.
As a proactive regulator, we want to find out more about these issues and others to ensure we continue to be alive to and in tune with prevailing standards when interpreting and applying the rules. Consequently, we will be doing three things: examining evidence on gender stereotyping in ads, seeking views from a range of stakeholders, and commissioning our own research into public opinion.
We are eager to hear about what stakeholders and the research tell us about gender stereotyping in ads and the impact of such advertising, which will help shape the project as we move forward. In particular, we are keen for people and organisations to send us any research they have on this issue. Evidence can be sent to us at gender@asa.org.uk.
We are requesting submissions by the end of June to help inform the approach we take to the public research we will be carrying out. After June, we will still be happy to receive evidence and consider it, but it won’t be able to inform the public research.
The project will report on whether we’re getting it right on gender stereotyping in ads. If the evidence suggests a change in regulation is merited we will set out the best way to achieve it.
Search your files!
My first reaction was loud laughter.
Research? Buddy, if this crap isn’t smacking you in the face like a snapped towel multiple times a day, you’re not paying attention.
I… guess they are more looking for evidence of the damage it does rather than the fact that it happens? Because everyone knows advertisements are sexist as pretty much anything can be.
Knowing it happens and having a broad set of solid evidence about it are different things. I suspect they want to amass a collection of examples from many regions and media, and crowdsourcing seems a reasonable way to do that.
… And that’s what Samantha said but I didn’t notice. Sorry!