“Conflict of interest” doesn’t even describe it
It gets worse. The Times asks questions about the conflicts of interest.
Even if he no longer manages his businesses directly, Mr. Trump will continue to own them and his family will be involved in deals, both foreign and domestic, to develop real estate projects or license his brand. He will still be aware of the existence of his business interests and how his actions as president will affect them. The conflicts between his private interests and his public role will be impossible to untangle.
And it’s not as if he’s such an obviously principled, public spirited, integrity-endowed guy that we can just trust him to get it right. No, it’s not. Very much the opposite.
And now we get the actual friction sites, and it’s a horror-show.
For example, the profitability of his investments in the Middle East, India, Turkey, the former Soviet republics and elsewhere could put his financial interests directly at odds with American foreign policy, whether it takes the form of sanctions against those governments or American investment and aid deals. In such situations, will he act to protect or grow his family’s assets or advance the interests of the country? His businesses currently owe hundreds of millions of dollars to Deutsche Bank, which is negotiating a multibillion-dollar mortgage settlement with the Department of Justice. How would the public know if he or his Justice Department softened its stance because it involved a bank to which he owes money, or whether that bank cut him a sweetheart deal in hopes of currying favor?
Wow. That is just mind-boggling.
Mr. Trump will also face numerous conflicts with enforcement of domestic laws and regulations. For instance, the people he appoints to the National Labor Relations Board will be in charge of investigating complaints by workers at his hotels and golf courses. The board on Nov. 3 ordered the Trump International Hotel Las Vegas to bargain with a union representing its housekeeping staff, maintenance workers and other employees. Will a board made up of Trump appointees choose to enforce similar decisions? Will the Justice Department be willing to investigate and bring cases against his businesses for, say, racially discriminatory actions? The fact is, any decision by the labor board — or by any agency in the Trump administration — that affects the Trump businesses would be tainted by a conflict of interest.
Mind.boggling.
Gee, that’s a tough one. Hard to tell. I’ll check with Nugent, see what he thinks.
(/sarcasm)
I’m sure many of his supporters would nod approvingly and comment that it just demonstrates what an astute businessman he is…
And the swamp thickens.
Well, it could be worse. He could run a charity that has saved millions of lives. That would clearly be unacceptable in a presidential candidate, and worth many many stories about the “questions raised” by such an endeavor.
Like Mel Brooks said: “It’s good to be the king.”
You know, if the Democrats have a lick of sense, this would be an excellent time to push, hard, for ethics legislation covering these sorts of conflicts. And if the Republicans stonewall (especially GOP Reps and Sens up for re-election in two years), that should be made a key campaign issue against them. Best part: GOP congresscritters who see the writing on the wall and back the proposals will immediately become honorees on Trump’s shit-list, thereby isolating him further from the party.
Am I foolish for hoping the Dems might not roll over this time? We need them all fighting!