Highly inflammatory
The Independent on Warwick University’s Student Union’s cancellation of Maryam’s talk.
Maryam Namazie had been booked by the Warwick Atheists, Secularists and Humanists (WASH) group to speak about secularism to Warwick University’s Student Union on 28 October.
However, the group was notified last month that Ms Namazie’s speech had been cancelled. The decision has led campaigners to raise concerns about student bodies across the UK thwarting freedom of speech on their campuses.
The union said that “after researching both [Ms Namazie] and her organisation, a number of flags have been raised. We have a duty of care to conduct a risk assessment for each speaker who wishes to come to campus”.
Articles written by Ms Namazie indicated she was “highly inflammatory” and “could incite hatred on campus”, according to the union.
Prejudicial, your honor. Also false.
Ms Namazie, who fled Iran with her family in 1980 after the revolution, said she was likely to have spoken about apostasy, blasphemy and nudity in the age of Isis. She told The Independent she was “angry” her talk had been blocked.
“They’re basically labelling me a racist and an extremist for speaking out against Islam and Islamism,” she said.
“If people like me who fled an Islamist regime can’t speak out about my opposition to the far-right Islamic movement, if I can’t criticise Islam… that leaves very [few] options for me as a dissenter because the only thing I have is my freedom of expression.
“If anyone is inciting hatred, it’s the Islamists who are threatening people like me just for deciding we want to be atheist, just because we don’t want to toe the line.”
Not to mention the Student Union, which called her “highly inflammatory” and apt to “incite hatred on campus.”
WASH appealed against the union’s decision earlier this month, and the National Secular Society is writing to them to ask them to do better.
“Unfortunately it is part of a worrying wave of censorship that we’re seeing across British universities under the guise of ‘safe spaces’… it’s utterly disheartening,” said Stephen Evans, the society’s campaigns manager. The concept of “safe spaces” had a “chilling effect on free speech,” he added.
Isaac Leigh, president of Warwick Student Union said: “The initial decision was made for the right of Muslim students not to feel intimidated or discriminated against on their university campus… rather than in the interest of suppressing free speech.”
“A final decision on this issue will be reached by the most senior members of the Student Union in coming days,” he said.
So now is the time to urge them to make the right final decision.
They should let her speak.
Students will not be forced at gunpoint to attend, so any who fear that listening to her will make them feel uncomfortable – and who don’t like to feel uncomfortable – can simply stay away.
If they fear that what she says will be inaccurate or false, then they can attend the talk and correct any misconceptions in the Q&A session afterwards. Or make their own speeches.
Speech is only dangerous to ideas. Ideas are only dangerous if people use them as an excuse to commit violence.