He only ever imagines doing awful, authoritarian things
I guess Donald Trump is to the Right what George Galloway is to the Left. Galloway considers himself on the Left in some sense, but I (along with of course many others), despite being on the Left, consider him a terrible person. So it apparently is with Peter Suderman, a senior editor at Reason magazine, when it comes to Trump. His article is elegantly titled Donald Trump Is a Bad Person.
His declaration yesterday that he would close the United States to all Muslim immigrants, including tourists and Muslim American citizens abroad trying to return home, confirmed both his fascistic tendencies and his undisguised bigotry, and made something else clear in the process: that he is simply a bad person.
As much as anything, this is the undercurrent that runs throughout the stories that have defined Trump since the beginning of his campaign: He mocked Vietnam POW John McCain for being captured during the war; he lobbed sexist jibes at Fox News host Megyn Kelly for daring to confront him about his history of misogyny; he mocked a disabled reporter, then falsely claimed he’d never met the man; he smeared immigrants as rapists; he’s Tweeted snide remarks about the wife of one of his competitors; when the crowd attacked a Black Lives Matter protestor at Trump campaign event last month, Trump sided with the crowd, saying he “should have been roughed up”; he insisted, contrary to all evidence, that thousands of Muslims celebrated the terror attack of 9/11 on camera; he lies constantly, flagrantly, and without shame.
And that all adds up to a bad person – someone who is mean and belligerent and a bully, as well as a liar. I agree that that adds up to a bad person.
And yet he’s very popular. What does that say about the US? Nothing good. Nothing at all good.
That gleeful, unapolagetic incivility is at the root of what makes him a bad person, and also at the root his approach to politics and policy. Most of his proposals, to the limited extent that they can be understood as remotely serious, are insults in policy form.
In addition to last night’s ban on Muslim travel to the U.S., he has called for the forcible government closure of mosques. When asked recently, he said Muslims should be tracked via government database. He promised that as president he would simply deport 11 million immigrants in short order after taking office, an impossible maneuver intended mostly to demonstrate his disdain for immigrants. He does not merely want to deport people who came to United States illegally; he also wants to deport millions of their children. He has repeatedly voiced enthusiastic support for federal seizure of private property through eminent domain, and, as a real estate investor, taken advantage of it himself.
And yet he’s widely liked and admired.
Trump’s penchant for authoritarianism frequently blends with his total lack of interest in the operational details of his policies, as well as the fact that he simply appears to be wildly uninformed about the world.
In a campaign speech last night, for example, Trump not only repeated his declaration that Muslims should not be allowed into the country, he said that the United States might have close to down the Internet in some places in order to stop terrorism.
“We have to see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what’s happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, ‘Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.’ These are foolish people.”
Every bit of this is dumb. It starts dumb, and then gets dumber. It is like a mad lib designed to show how dumb Donald Trump is about tech companies, the Internet, federal power, freedom of speech, and the Constitution, all at once.
And it is dumb in a particular way that helps demonstrate what a bad person he is. It is not just that he says stupid things that demonstrate his ignorance. It is that, in his stupidity and ignorance, he only ever imagines doing awful, authoritarian things, the way a bad person would.
And that, Suderman concludes, is why he’s so popular.
He speaks to the amygdala, adrenals, hypothalamus, anything but the prefrontal cortex. That stimulation can really override critical thinking like nobody’s business.
If Trump became president, even athiest old me would start believing in the prophecy of the “anti-christ leading a great nation” and prepare myself for the end days. I’m not sure what that preparation would look like beyond stocking bottles of good red wine, a bunch of really good weed and some fantastic literature. Might as well enjoy myself before everything “blows up real good”.
That last line was an SCTV reference wasn’t it?
I suspect that’s because he only ‘thinks’ with his amygdala, adrenals, hypothalamus, anything but his prefrontal cortex.
I don’t. I think he is calculating and knows how to manipulate his audience. He runs his tv shows that way.
Rats, cats and puppies are calculating and know how to manipulate us as well. There’s not much evidence of advanced pre-frontal cortex there either. I suspect he has a lot of drive and determination, a grossly inflated ego and an ability to identify desired outcomes. He employs a lot of people who make the detail happen. You only need to look at his answers to questions regarding policy detail to see he has utterly no idea about how things actually work.
Trump is not what is driving this; Trump is merely an opportunist. There have always been people like Trump; there will always be people like Trump. Trump himself has been around for decades; he was never a political problem before, he was just an annoying real estate developer. If it wasn’t Trump now, it would be someone else like him.
What is driving this is that the elites–the people who run the country, the economy, the banking system; sometimes called the 1%, but really the 0.1% and the 0.01%–the elites, through a combination of greed and fecklessness, have well and truly screwed the pooch. They pulled off a $1T bank heist, which had the side effect of wrecking the economy, and then rather than try to repair any of the damage they have done, they stood around gawking; yammering about deficits and hyperinflation; angling for more tax cuts for the rich; blamed it all on Obama, and left the 99% to twist in the wind.
We’ve reached the point where the Republican leadership has lost credibility with its base. When this happens, the Republican base does not start reading Krugman and voting for Sanders. Instead, they revert to an ancient and primitive defense mechanism: close ranks and kill the outsiders. When hunter-gatherers do this it is called tribalism; when an agrarian society does this it is called a pogrom; when an industrialized society does this it is called fascism.
It happened in Germany in the 1930s. There was worry that it would happen in Greece just a year ago. We saw the beginnings of it in the United States in 2012, when the Republican primary turned into a clown car, before finally settling on an establishment candidate–who went on to lose, partly because his own base didn’t much like him. And it is starting to look like in 2016 the Republican leadership won’t even be able to run an establishment candidate.
I’m going to put in another plug for Cracks In The Wall, which lays out some of this dynamic in part ii:
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-i-defining.html
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-ii-listening-to.html
http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2006/08/cracks-in-wall-part-iii-escape-ladders.html
It’s an error to describe Trump as “widely popular” or similar terms. He’s got, at most, 30% of half the voting population. He is unlikely to ever acquire much more than this, and he knows it–for him, this is about nothing more than expanding his brand and marketing himself. He IS hoping, I think, to make it to the convention, where his 25% (most likely by that point, if he’s still in it) will enable him to play kingmaker between the other two candidates (who will most likely be Big Business and Confederate Jesus candidates, respectively).
The big thing about Trump is not that he, himself is awful. It’s that he’s the natural result of the GOP’s tactics since Reagan–appeal to a highly motivated fanatical fringe that is full of fear of their growing irrelevance. This group (commonly marked as the Tea Party) comprises a minority of the party, but their fanaticism means that if you have them, you get them all.
As a result, you can’t swing a dead cat at a GOP convention without hitting a neo-fascist. The cost of rejecting these folks, at this point, is too high for the party to bear.
have well and truly screwed the pooch.
Yes they have. They’re a bunch of apatride, indifferent incompetents who couldn’t run a news stand.
I find it a bit facile to dismiss Trump’s success as just ‘dumb’.
Trump’s outrageous statements are now redefining the parameters of what can and cannot be said.
His aggressive posture and bombast is being welcomed by some as a refreshing change from Obama’s timid and tepid leadership.
Obama’s presidency is an utter disappointment, It has left the country with a lack of leadership. America appears rudderless.
I just cringed 7 years ago when Obama was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize barely two weeks after being sworn into office. What had he done, exactly?
He had yet to sing a single note, but had already won The Grammy
The expectations set were so unrealistic, fueled by a complicit and fawning press, that a major disillusionment/disappointment was inevitable.
So here we are.
And then there’s ISLAM… a word no one to wants to pronounce, a topic no one wants to address.
Trump can and he did.
So if between now and election day next November there are further attacks à la Paris or San Bernardino or Charlie Hebdo, Trump could very well find himself sitting pretty in the White House.
And if, after YET another jihadist attack, one more spineless, milquetoast politician, utters the words *My thoughts and prayers are with the family and friends of the victims*
…I will barf.
And NO…this is NOT an endorsement of Trump.
Don’t get me wrong.
It’s just me expressing my exasperation at a whole class of careerist pols, vote whores, so worthless and so useless they’ve actually made people like Trump a potential president.
Just when I was despairing about the crop of buffoons that constitute my country’s political elite, Donald Trump appears out of nowhere, thank you America!
Trump is making suggestions and offering ideas, even if some of them are barking mad, while Western politicians seem generally unable to offer ‘solutions’ to the threat to liberal democracy. I wouldn’t assume that, as Suderman does, that authoritarian people are necessarily stupid, btw.
Whatever his agenda, Donald Trump is obviously having a lot fun and perhaps he’s preparing the stage for another candidate.
https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xlt1/t31.0-8/s2048x2048/12363225_1086678968017230_6453146521606893962_o.jpg
https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/t31.0-8/s2048x2048/12339182_1086683181350142_4572747431640267375_o.jpg
“Just when I was despairing about the crop of buffoons that constitute my country’s political elite, Donald Trump appears out of nowhere, thank you America! ”
Yeah – the Tory leader in Scotland, Ruth Davidson, (not a buffoon):-
“So, twitter, we’re all agreed? Trump’s a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?”
Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, also took him to task. Even the vile UKIP leader Nigel Farage. I felt proud of the comparative sanity & decency of our own Tories. Trump is astonishing. He says the kind of thing that an obscure UKIP Councillor of a small town or one of the harder Northern Irish Protestants would say – like gay marriage causes floods or something of that ilk, which would be laughed about and forgotten. & now he’s running for the Presidency.
Every four years you Americans with your weird political system of not having the leader of the opposition in place scare the rest of the world with these competitions of the wildly irresponsible which make us long for dull guys like Eisenhower. Are you taking the piss?