That sends a message about what the point of women is.… Read the rest
Carlin Romano sniggers at Hitchens
Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWhat an ugly mind is here displayed.… Read the rest
New Statesman interviews Ann Widdicombe
Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia Benson“I left the Church of England because there was a huge bundle of straw. The ordination of women was the last straw.”… Read the rest
A heap of illiberal dreck in the New Statesman
Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonBryan Appleyard explains why religion is mandatory.… Read the rest
Terry Sanderson defends secularism
Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonSecularism protects us all from the authoritarianism that is characteristic of religion when it has temporal power.… Read the rest
Theology
Jul 18th, 2010 5:36 pm | By Ophelia BensonArchbishop Donald W. Wuerl says it’s not that the church disrespects women. Oh fuck no, said the chair of the US bishops’ Committee on Doctrine, the church thinks women are just lovely.
Noting that women hold a variety of church leadership positions in parishes and dioceses, Archbishop Wuerl said, “The church’s gratitude toward women cannot be stated strongly enough.”
“Women offer unique insight, creative abilities and unstinting generosity at the very heart of the Catholic Church,” he said.
They have that there women’s intuition, and they’re so creative with the flowers and the packed lunches and the…the flowers, and the generosity just never quits, they give us all their money and a lot of the time they let us … Read the rest
Archbishop explains why church excludes women
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWomen are just precious and darling, he said, but priests have always been men, and we can’t change that.… Read the rest
With What Authority does a Public Philosopher Speak?
Jul 18th, 2010 | By Andrew TaggartIn the transition from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, we have (so Internet gurus like to suggest) moved from a top-down, “authoritarian” approach to web content to an interactive, user-generated, kaleidoscopic, and, above all, more “democratic” social experiment. As Elie Ofek, a professor of marketing and expert on business innovation, recently put it, consumers “now want to customize content and products to fit their preferences and personality, get immediate feedback on their actions and opinions, and be rewarded for their contributions.” If the bromide that Internet content wants to be free is actually true, then how much more true is it that people in an open society, those committed to a virtual public sphere as well as to each … Read the rest
Jason Rosenhouse asks: where’s the backlash?
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe New Atheists are said to be bad for evolution acceptance and education, but the numbers show not the slightest evidence of a backlash.… Read the rest
Johann Hari on Polanski and the “lynch mob”
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonIt’s ok to drug and rape a 13-year-old girl as long as you’re an artist, we are told.… Read the rest
“The New Atheists” have no evidence
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia Benson“Think of the range of legitimate positions that can be taken on the question of whether earthworms are conscious.”… Read the rest
Ratzinger’s office failed to act on child rape
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonRatzinger was part of a culture of nonresponsibility, denial, legalistic foot-dragging and outright obstruction.… Read the rest
Clueless in Rome
Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia Benson“It’s not for canonical legislation to get itself involved with civil law,” one prelate airily declared.… Read the rest
“Respecting” faith while “appreciating” science
Jul 17th, 2010 4:32 pm | By Ophelia BensonMichael Zimmerman of the Clergy Letter Project is annoyed at (wait for it) “New Atheists.” He says members of the project have been “relentlessly attacked by “New Atheists.”
The crux of these attacks seems to take two forms. In the first, clergy members are ridiculed simply for having religious faith. In the second, supposedly intelligent people pretend they are unable to distinguish these clergy members from the fundamentalists…
He doesn’t quote or name or link to any “New Atheists” doing this, so it’s hard to know if his description is accurate, but in any case…he seems to have the usual, and socially conventional, blind spot about “religious faith.” He seems, in other words, to be blind to the fact that … Read the rest
The Taliban war on women continues
Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonWhen the Taliban told 22-year-old Hossai to quit her job, she refused to be bullied. She was shot and killed.… Read the rest
“Leave your job or we will cut off your head”
Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia Benson“We warn you to leave your job as a teacher or we will cut off the heads of your children and set fire to your daughter.”… Read the rest
Look out, the “new” atheists are attacking
Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonThe members of the Clergy Letter project have been ‘relentlessly attacked by “New Atheists.”‘… Read the rest
The creationism problem in US education
Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia Benson47% of high school science teachers believe in ID; only 28% believe in god-free evolution.… Read the rest
Naughty dog bites when attacked
Jul 16th, 2010 4:11 pm | By Ophelia BensonYet another smug unthinking cliché-filled diatribe about zealous fundamentalist literalist evangelist atheism, this time from Reza Aslan. It’s as original as the other nine million.
The parallels with religious fundamentalism are obvious and startling: the conviction that they are in sole possession of truth (scientific or otherwise), the troubling lack of tolerance for the views of their critics (Dawkins has compared creationists to Holocaust deniers), the insistence on a literalist reading of scripture (more literalist, in fact, than one finds among most religious fundamentalists), the simplistic reductionism of the religious phenomenon, and, perhaps most bizarrely, their overwhelming sense of siege: the belief that they have been oppressed and marginalized by Western societies…
He says, in the very act of … Read the rest
Yet another “new atheists are evangelical” bore
Jul 16th, 2010 | Filed by Ophelia BensonEvangelistic, zealous, fundamentalism, sole possession of truth, lack of tolerance, simplistic reductionism.… Read the rest