When men make lists of sexiest scientists *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

That sends a message about what the point of women is.… Read the rest



Carlin Romano sniggers at Hitchens *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

What an ugly mind is here displayed.… Read the rest



New Statesman interviews Ann Widdicombe *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

“I left the Church of England because there was a huge bundle of straw. The ordination of women was the last straw.”… Read the rest



A heap of illiberal dreck in the New Statesman *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

Bryan Appleyard explains why religion is mandatory.… Read the rest



Terry Sanderson defends secularism *

Jul 19th, 2010 | Filed by

Secularism protects us all from the authoritarianism that is characteristic of religion when it has temporal power.… Read the rest



Theology

Jul 18th, 2010 5:36 pm | By

Archbishop Donald W. Wuerl says it’s not that the church disrespects women. Oh fuck no, said the chair of the US bishops’ Committee on Doctrine, the church thinks women are just lovely.

Noting that women hold a variety of church leadership positions in parishes and dioceses, Archbishop Wuerl said, “The church’s gratitude toward women cannot be stated strongly enough.”

“Women offer unique insight, creative abilities and unstinting generosity at the very heart of the Catholic Church,” he said.

They have that there women’s intuition, and they’re so creative with the flowers and the packed lunches and the…the flowers, and the generosity just never quits, they give us all their money and a lot of the time they let us … Read the rest



Archbishop explains why church excludes women *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

Women are just precious and darling, he said, but priests have always been men, and we can’t change that.… Read the rest



With What Authority does a Public Philosopher Speak?

Jul 18th, 2010 | By Andrew Taggart

In the transition from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0, we have (so Internet gurus like to suggest) moved from a top-down, “authoritarian” approach to web content to an interactive, user-generated, kaleidoscopic, and, above all, more “democratic” social experiment. As Elie Ofek, a professor of marketing and expert on business innovation, recently put it, consumers “now want to customize content and products to fit their preferences and personality, get immediate feedback on their actions and opinions, and be rewarded for their contributions.” If the bromide that Internet content wants to be free is actually true, then how much more true is it that people in an open society, those committed to a virtual public sphere as well as to each … Read the rest



Jason Rosenhouse asks: where’s the backlash? *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

The New Atheists are said to be bad for evolution acceptance and education, but the numbers show not the slightest evidence of a backlash.… Read the rest



Johann Hari on Polanski and the “lynch mob” *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

It’s ok to drug and rape a 13-year-old girl as long as you’re an artist, we are told.… Read the rest



“The New Atheists” have no evidence *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

“Think of the range of legitimate positions that can be taken on the question of whether earthworms are conscious.”… Read the rest



Ratzinger’s office failed to act on child rape *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

Ratzinger was part of a culture of nonresponsibility, denial, legalistic foot-dragging and outright obstruction.… Read the rest



Clueless in Rome *

Jul 18th, 2010 | Filed by

“It’s not for canonical legislation to get itself involved with civil law,” one prelate airily declared.… Read the rest



“Respecting” faith while “appreciating” science

Jul 17th, 2010 4:32 pm | By

Michael Zimmerman of the Clergy Letter Project is annoyed at (wait for it) “New Atheists.” He says members of the project have been “relentlessly attacked by “New Atheists.”

The crux of these attacks seems to take two forms. In the first, clergy members are ridiculed simply for having religious faith. In the second, supposedly intelligent people pretend they are unable to distinguish these clergy members from the fundamentalists…

He doesn’t quote or name or link to any “New Atheists” doing this, so it’s hard to know if his description is accurate, but in any case…he seems to have the usual, and socially conventional, blind spot about “religious faith.” He seems, in other words, to be blind to the fact that … Read the rest



The Taliban war on women continues *

Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by

When the Taliban told 22-year-old Hossai to quit her job, she refused to be bullied. She was shot and killed.… Read the rest



“Leave your job or we will cut off your head” *

Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by

“We warn you to leave your job as a teacher or  we will cut off the heads of your children and set fire to your daughter.”… Read the rest



Look out, the “new” atheists are attacking *

Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by

The members of the Clergy Letter project have been ‘relentlessly attacked by “New Atheists.”‘… Read the rest



The creationism problem in US education *

Jul 17th, 2010 | Filed by

47% of high school science teachers believe in ID; only 28% believe in god-free evolution.… Read the rest



Naughty dog bites when attacked

Jul 16th, 2010 4:11 pm | By

Yet another smug unthinking cliché-filled diatribe about zealous fundamentalist literalist evangelist atheism, this time from Reza Aslan. It’s as original as the other nine million.

The parallels with religious fundamentalism are obvious and startling: the conviction that they are in sole possession of truth (scientific or otherwise), the troubling lack of tolerance for the views of their critics (Dawkins has compared creationists to Holocaust deniers), the insistence on a literalist reading of scripture (more literalist, in fact, than one finds among most religious fundamentalists), the simplistic reductionism of the religious phenomenon, and, perhaps most bizarrely, their overwhelming sense of siege: the belief that they have been oppressed and marginalized by Western societies…

He says, in the very act of … Read the rest



Yet another “new atheists are evangelical” bore *

Jul 16th, 2010 | Filed by

Evangelistic, zealous, fundamentalism, sole possession of truth, lack of tolerance, simplistic reductionism.… Read the rest