Another pre-emptive self-censorship *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

A cartoon that does not show Mohammed. Some newspapers turned pale and said no no no no we can’t run that.… Read the rest



Sam Harris on the Daily Show *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

Harris says moral realism is suspect. Perhaps not suspect but complex, says Stewart. Quite.… Read the rest



Appropriate decorum

Oct 5th, 2010 12:11 pm | By

A guy called Erich Vieth did a useful interview with Paul Kurtz the other day. There are some odd things in it, which could shed some oblique light on the PK-CFI quarrel.

PK says he left voluntarily but under great duress, which is useful to know. I don’t think I’ve seen that before. Then they talk about why no explanation of his resignation appeared in Free Inquiry, and he said it was because it was censored. Vieth said isn’t that at odds with free inquiry?

PK: It is similar to thought police. Alas! They refused to publish three of my editorials, and they refused to publish my statement regarding my resignation. What a contradiction. Even though I am the founder

Read the rest


Jesus and Mo on the Vatican on condoms and IVF *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

The Catholic church is against both because…?… Read the rest



Erich Vieth interviews Paul Kurtz *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

“They refused to publish my statement regarding my resignation…I consider this as similar to a Board of Bishops seeking to control its Founder.”… Read the rest



Institute for Ideas throws more crap at secularism *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

“Militant secularists call for the Pope to be refused entry to the country on the grounds he offends victims of child abuse, sexism and homophobia.”… Read the rest



Keith Olbermann and Steven Pinker talk evolution *

Oct 5th, 2010 | Filed by

What difference does it make to education? If you sow confusion about evolution, you sow confusion about biology.… Read the rest



World Day against the Death Penalty *

Oct 4th, 2010 | Filed by

The Save Ashtiani campaign invites everyone to endorse a resolution against capital punishment.… Read the rest



Don’t I feel special

Oct 4th, 2010 5:37 pm | By

I skimmed The Observer’s profile of Karen Armstrong yesterday, but I must have done a sloppy job of it, because I failed to notice something that if I’d really been properly skimming, would have jumped out at me. I never would have known about it if Nicholas Lawrence hadn’t told me.

But like Kissinger, Armstrong has enemies. Many devout Catholics quietly accuse her of treachery, while professional theologians despise her for emphasising the opposition between rationality and faith. Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom have accused her of being a religious apologist who covers up inconvenient texts to bolster the idea there is no conflict between modern morality and religion in matters, for instance, of gender and sexuality.

Well now I … Read the rest



Vatican honcho pitches fit about Nobel for Edwards *

Oct 4th, 2010 | Filed by

All those abandoned or dead embryos are his fault, said the head of the “Pontifical Academy for Life.”… Read the rest



The Allahabad court ruling is a blow against India’s secularism *

Oct 4th, 2010 | Filed by

Rather than wresting India from Hindu majoritarianism, the high court’s verdict has given legal imprimatur to it.… Read the rest



More on CFI, with some actual information for a change

Oct 4th, 2010 10:32 am | By

I’ve said more than once that I don’t have a firm opinion about who is more right (or wrong) in the dispute between the Center for Inquiry and its founder and former director Paul Kurtz. I still don’t, but one thing I do think is that when the dispute gets into a major media outlet, the reporting is incomplete.

I have an opportunity to rectify that a little, because I saw something Barry Karr said on Facebook this morning that clarified or expanded a couple of points. I got his permission to quote him, and asked two questions of my own. Karr is the Chief Financial Officer of CFI and Executive Director of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.

Here is … Read the rest



The Observer profiles Karen Armstrong *

Oct 4th, 2010 | Filed by

“But like Kissinger, Armstrong has enemies.” Many devout Catholics, and…Ophelia Benson and Jeremy Stangroom. Ha!… Read the rest



Marilynne Robinson reviews Sam Harris *

Oct 4th, 2010 | Filed by

“If he were to articulate a positive morality of his own, he might well arrive at its heights to find them occupied by the whole tribe of Unitarians.”… Read the rest



Is-ought and all that

Oct 3rd, 2010 5:48 pm | By

Anthony Appiah says something in his review of Sam Harris’s The Moral Landscape that I don’t get – it looks wrong to me, but Appiah’s a philosopher and I’m not, so help me out here. Maybe he spoke in haste, or maybe a sub changed his wording, or maybe I’m just wrong.

Harris means to deny a thought often ascribed to David Hume, according to which there is a clear conceptual distinction between facts and values. Facts are susceptible of rational investigation; values, supposedly, not. But according to Harris, values, too, can be uncovered by science…

I thought the point was that facts can’t, as a matter of logic, get you to values. That doesn’t make values not susceptible of … Read the rest



Appiah reviews Sam Harris on morality *

Oct 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

What he ends up endorsing is something very like utilitarianism, a philosophical position that faces a battery of familiar problems.… Read the rest



Raheel Raza at the UN tells off the Pakistani ambassador *

Oct 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

And Tariq Ramadan, for good measure.… Read the rest



Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes

Oct 3rd, 2010 11:22 am | By

To re-cap: we have The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion, edited by Peter Harrison, director of  The Ian Ramsey Centre for science and religion in the University of Oxford, a Templeton-funded outfit whose previous director won the Templeton Prize. Harrison says in his introduction that this Companion gives short shrift to the view that science and religion are in fact incompatible.

We also have a BBC article by Thomas Dixon saying, in a roundabout sort of way, that science and religion are compatible. Dixon wrote the Oxford University Press Science and Religion: a very short introduction. Under “About the author” on that page we learn that

Thomas Dixon is Lecturer in History at Queen Mary, University

Read the rest


Science and religion are totally in love *

Oct 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

Really. Don’t worry about it. Just ponder the infinite possibilities of the unknown, and it will all fall into place.… Read the rest



Niqab and shorts video protests burqa ban *

Oct 3rd, 2010 | Filed by

I thought it was protesting the burqa, but no, it’s protesting the ban. The logic escapes me.… Read the rest