Norman Levitt on Kennewick Man *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

What is a government department doing endorsing the idea that traditions and myths count as evidence?… Read the rest



Massimo Pigliucci on Science and Religion *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Do scientists ‘keep the faith’ and if so is that a good thing? Is religion a good source of morality?… Read the rest



Martin Gardner looks at a Center for nonsense studies. *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Dowsing, homeopathy, Tarot cards and their relevance to mental health professions, and, of course, alien abductions.… Read the rest



Science, Scientism, and Anti-Science in the Age of Preposterism *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

What is the difference between genuine inquiry and the sham and fake variety?… Read the rest



Lies, Self-Deception and Magical Thinking *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Psychoanalysis was never, despite Freud’s ‘positivist rhetoric,’ a science; it was a ‘purely speculative enterprise,’ argues Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen.… Read the rest



Richard Dawkins’ review of Not in Our Genes *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

In their ‘paranoiac and demonological theology of science’ Lewontin, Kamin and Rose fire both barrels with equal monotony and imprecision: ‘determinism’ and ‘reductionism’. But the gallant little fire brigade has perpetrated a fatuous little book.… Read the rest



You Mean Movie Characters Aren’t Real People? *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

No it’s not just an accident that the character who gets Tom Hanks killed in Saving Private Ryan is both an intellectual and a coward. Spielberg is making a point, a bad point, and we need to pay attention.… Read the rest



‘Why should science be any different?’ *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘We no longer defer to bishops or politicians; scientists are simply facing the same fate.’ Yes but bishops are one thing and scientists are another. We can demand that scientists produce evidence, but what evidence can a bishop offer?… Read the rest



Jihad versus McWorld *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

In the 1992 article that he expanded into an excellent book, Barber examines the ways Identity and Shopping are dividing the world between them.… Read the rest



Tom Frank on ‘Market Populism’ *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Extreme diets and extreme investing, diversity all around, along with a consensus as ironclad as any in the ’50s.… Read the rest



Bias, as in Confirmation Bias *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Being on the side of the rich and powerful ought to make it hard to play victim, but the right in the US manages it by seeing ‘liberal’ bias in the media even when it’s…not there.… Read the rest



A Duty to Annoy *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Is feminism about being a fragile flower needing protection and consolation at every hint of conflict? Or is it about being a cactus and fighting back. Wendy Kaminer disavows florality.… Read the rest



Please, No More Glamorama *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

James Wood on the grim outlook for social realism and ‘hysterical realism’, which may allow a space for the aesthetic and the contemplative again.… Read the rest



Meera Nanda on the Case for Indian Enlightenment *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Meera Nanda had good reasons to fight against patriarchal, upper-caste Hindu traditions that would have suppressed all she valued. Science was not ‘elitist’ or Western but a way of life and a philosophy for social action.… Read the rest



Richard Dawkins Karate-chops Fashionable Nonsense *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Dawkins on fun and games.… Read the rest



Not What You Think but How You Think *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘He was very easily irritated by anything bogus, anything facile or hypocritical.’… Read the rest



Paul Boghossian on the Sokal Hoax *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

‘How, given the recent and sorry history of ideologically motivated conceptions of knowledge — Lysenkoism in Stalin’s Soviet Union, for example, or Nazi critiques of `Jewish science’ — could it again have become acceptable to behave in this way?’… Read the rest



Yale as a Place Where Language Goes to Die *

Apr 10th, 2010 | Filed by

Helena Echlin on the misery of being a PhD candidate in English and American literature at Yale. She has to stifle her urge to write ‘eh?’ in the margins, discovers that obfuscation is de rigeur, and that people who talk nonsense are now looked upon not as sloppy thinkers, but as sages.… Read the rest



Just so you know

Apr 10th, 2010 4:58 pm | By

Don’t worry if one day soon you click on B&W and get a page saying ‘migration in progress’ – it won’t be a bit of hackery, and it won’t take long. B&W is moving – to a better world. Be grateful to Josh Larios.… Read the rest



Excuse me sir

Apr 10th, 2010 4:46 pm | By

What a brilliant idea. Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens

have asked human rights lawyers to produce a case for charging Pope Benedict XVI over his alleged cover-up of sexual abuse in the Catholic church. The pair believe they can exploit the same legal principle used to arrest Augusto Pinochet, the late Chilean dictator, when he visited Britain in 1998. The Pope was embroiled in new controversy this weekend over a letter he signed arguing that the “good of the universal church” should be considered against the defrocking of an American priest who committed sex offences against two boys. It was dated 1985, when he was in charge of the [Inquisition]… Dawkins and Hitchens believe the Pope would be unable

Read the rest