Oh dear, our mistake, so sorry
There’s been a lot of buzz about the New York Times article on a meeting of the SEC in 2004 that apparently did a lot to cause this little difficulty (you know, banks flopping, 700 billion public dollars tossed away in hopes of mollifying Wall Street, that little difficulty). It’s rather irritating to read.
[T]he five members of the Securities and Exchange Commission met in a basement hearing room to consider an urgent plea by the big investment banks. They wanted an exemption for their brokerage units from an old regulation that limited the amount of debt they could take on. The exemption would unshackle billions of dollars held in reserve as a cushion against losses on their investments.
And they got what they wanted, and it all went blooey, and now we have to pay for it. Money that could have gone for a national health service or education will be pissed away on toxic debts. It’s regrettable.
Those funds could then flow up to the parent company, enabling it to invest in the fast-growing but opaque world of mortgage-backed securities; credit derivatives, a form of insurance for bond holders; and other exotic instruments. The five investment banks led the charge, including Goldman Sachs, which was headed by Henry M. Paulson Jr. Two years later, he left to become Treasury secretary.
Ah – the very guy who demanded the 700 billion with no questions asked, no supervision, no amendments, and no delay. Interesting. He helped cause an economic meltdown, and now he’s landed us with a 700 billion dollar debt. And yet some commentators were surprised at the level of anger among the Amurican people. Because – why? We should think this is a success story?
In loosening the capital rules, which are supposed to provide a buffer in turbulent times, the agency also decided to rely on the firms’ own computer models for determining the riskiness of investments, essentially outsourcing the job of monitoring risk to the banks themselves.
And – whaddya know – they didn’t do a very good job. And the SEC didn’t do its job either. So – 700 billion thrown away in an afternoon. Oh well! Plenty more where that came from.
The commission’s decision effectively to outsource its oversight to the firms themselves fit squarely in the broader Washington culture of the last eight years under President Bush. A similar closeness to industry and laissez-faire philosophy has driven a push for deregulation throughout the government, from the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency to worker safety and transportation agencies. “It’s a fair criticism of the Bush administration that regulators have relied on many voluntary regulatory programs,” said Roderick M. Hills, a Republican who was chairman of the S.E.C. under President Gerald R. Ford. “The problem with such voluntary programs is that, as we’ve seen throughout history, they often don’t work.”
Ahhhhhh yes – so they don’t! And there’s quite a well-understood reason for that, which can be summed up in the vulgar phrase about the fox guarding the henhouse. They don’t work because the people in charge of the voluntary programs have a vested interest in not making them work. It’s really quite simple. Too bad it took a total collapse of the global economy that we’ll be paying for for generations to drive that lesson home.
The lesson is not driven home – not at all. Spend 700 & things are ‘spick and span’ again, business as usual.
The masters of the universe can return to their digital game promising golden futures to us & foreclosing us when it gets a little sour for them. Next time the happy few loose 50% of too much, I fear they will ask 7000 from those who have lost a critical 10% of too little & say: ‘hey, it’s either this or: more guvvenment, more taxes.’ Whilst we are mesmerized by that tune they will take care to pick our pockets just to be on the safe side; another 70 can get them to Barbados or so, for the duration of the troubles.
The irony of Paulson is too much.
As with the war on Iraq, I’m waiting to hear a post-election Congress decry the ensuing misery they approved as based on (mis-)information received from on high.
Are American executives earning the same kind of money as the Irish ones – I wonder? The most senior executives at Irish banks earned close to €100m in the last four years, despite serious misjudgements over the property market that led to the Government bailing out the entire banking system last week.
Are you kidding? American executives notoriously earn grotesque, shaming, indefensible amounts of money. There are depressing statistics on this – Japanese executives earn something like 20 times as much as their lowest-paid workers; US executives earn…what is it now? 200 times as much?
Ah no – drastic underestimate. I did think I’d heard 300-something percent recently, but also thought that sounded awfully high, so went cautious. But no – average executive compensation is more than 364 times the pay of the average U.S. worker.
Yeah but, if you think about it the right way, it all makes sense. They’re paid according to how much damage they can do…
The Irish Minister for Finance, is set to appoint “public interest” directors to each of the six banks covered by the Government’s €400bn guarantee, the Sunday Independent can exclusively reveal. http://www.independent.ie
Will there be a similar system set in place in America? Will the big chiefs be held accountable to regulatory authorities?
One chief executive, has made almost €23.5m. Another, €21m in remuneration,
Another, €9m €11.4m – all in a few years.
Not too long ago, it could have been a week or so before the bank debacle, Irish bank chiefs, swore black and blue before an Oireachtas Dail Committee that everything was in order with their respective banks. So how in Jevohah’s name, could it be, that suddenly within such a short space of time of banks collapsing in America, that the Irish Government is now guaranteeing to bail them out to the tune of E400bn.
The population, in 2006, was 4,239,848 in the Republic of Ireland.
Thanks for the link, OB, it is a real eye-opener.
“So – 700 billion thrown away in an afternoon. Oh well! Plenty more where that came from.”
Yeah, for real sure, and by the time all is properly done and dusted, that meagre amount will have risen to two trillion, or thereabouts.
Is E400bn not an awful lot of money to gaurantee bailing out banks – when the population of Ireland, alone, is so terribly tiny? Sure, a lot of the population, self excluded, is very young?
Yeah. It’s absolute gospel here, that ‘home’ ownership is the best thing since the Big Bang. That’s why we have that ridiculous tax exemption for ‘home’ mortgages, which more sensible countries don’t have. It is also, indeed, presumably why all this sub-prime lending was for so long taken to be a good thing. I always thought it was schewpid.
I know what the logic was.
I read that Law enforcement officials have announced that the FBI is investigating Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman and AIG, expanding its inquiry into corporate mortgage fraud. Bit late is it not – when a near Depression was on the American doorstep-which could have spilled over and caused dire circumstances for the rest of the world.