Texas stands up for religion in public schools
Good old Texas. It has an exciting new law, HB 3678 or the ‘Religious Viewpoint Anti-Discrimination Act.’
Students may express their beliefs about religion in homework, artwork, and other written and oral assignments free from discrimination based on the religious content of their submissions. Homework and classroom assignments must be judged by ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance and against other legitimate pedagogical concerns identified by the school district. Students may not be penalized or rewarded on account of the religious content of their work.
May not be ‘penalized’ – as in given a bad grade or told they are wrong? Well, not necessarily – perhaps. I asked Brian Leiter about this alarming portent, and he pointed out that school officials will be able to fall back on that second sentence – at least in functional schools. But there are those other legitimate pedagogical concerns identified by the school district, and there is the little matter of what can happen to school districts. Think ‘Dover.’ There is also the odd wording – ‘standards of substance and relevance.’ Standards of what? What standards are those, and what good are they? They might as well be called standards of niceness and okayness. They’re not much of a guide, and therefore not very reassuring. It is very difficult not to picture biology classes and history classes (not that history is taught in public schools any more) in which the answer ‘God did it’ is acceptable. It is difficult not to picture Texas jam-packed full of schools in which all the students can freely prattle about Jesus and his good friend God and know nothing at all about anything else.
Throwing God into an essay on constitutional development in high school would be a pretty obvious thing to do, if discussing the rhetoric of the times it happened in.
This law strikes me as a natural reaction to what seems to be the ahistoric modern interpretation of the establishment clause.
AS LONG AS THE DISCRETION IS IN THE HANDS OF THE TEACHER!
Hadn’t you better shoot the doorbolts, arm the boobytraps and load your AR before posting via an anonymyza so as not to draw the crabs? Thick man.
Thanks for the link, GT. Here’s a nice quote from PZ’s piece:
“Demanding that you must be privileged to interject your religious opinions into a secular biology classroom is like demanding the right to respond to assignments in your math class with cooking recipes and limericks.”
One aggravating factor is the fact that in the US the ID/creationist crowd actually drill kids in how to disrupt a science lesson, giving them a catechism of questions.
You have to feel sorry for a science teacher faced with yet another snotty twerp parroting nonsense about the Cambrian explosion and the bacterial bloody flagellum.
Especially one who has the Texas legislature looking over her/his shoulder.
still, it’ll be amusing when the first teenager-out-fer-a-laff realises the potential of this law, and turns in their homework stuffed full of satanist references and imagery…
Shall we take bets as to what the reaction will be?
Apart from that, though, yeah, it’s the usual agenda rearing its ugly head again. (Oh, and ChrisPer, yes, they really DO have such an agenda, it IS a very serious issue, and I have first-hand evidence – my in-laws work for AnswersInGenesis – I’ve visited the “creationist dinosaur museum” already!, and I’ve been coerced into listening to their Baptist pastor drone on about it for far, far too long…
:-)
Andy, you actually wasted your valuable time (and money?) going to that creationist museum? Either you smoked a ginormous spliff first and went for a hoot, or your in-laws coerced you and te faltan cojones. I hope it’s the former. (Just thought of a 3rd poossibility. You went to recharge your “hater” batteries.)
Pretty sure most of you will enjoy this:
George Carlin on religion — 10 mins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8uBAPbOWLxc&mode=related&search=
or:
http://tinyurl.com/2jpm2m
G.T. bearing in mind that in the U.K.our head of state is also head of our established church,bishops have a seat in our upper house(lords)we have religious education in schools,would you describe this nation as a theocracy?
Religion in Public Schools. And a lot more. See:
atheism.about.com/od/publicschoolsnews/
Public Forums are no place to inflict personal beliefs on the masses. It is disrespectful to the remainder of the public gathering to assume that you have a right to impose your religious ideals on others.
As an aside
There is as well on same site a powerful gallery of pictures/writing worth viewing on the Witchcraft Inquisition etc.
Doug,
oh no, I’m “special” (hehe – I loved using that word at gigs, then reminding folks just how many different meanings it can have…)…
We (me, the missus, and the two mini-primates) got the dubious benefits of a free guided tour of the premises a couple of weeks before it opened…
ah, the benefits of having theocratic in-laws!
The animatronic dinos are really cool, but the whole thing was waaay too funny to get angry with – boy, was there some lip-biting going on that day…
You’ll be glad to know that my “Quantum Hate Energy” was entirely recharged a couple of days later, at their Baptist Temple Easter service…(I agreed to go along to help keep micro-primate quiet, & give me wife [who was under buckets of emotional blackmail/guilt/bullsh*t pressure to be there] (im)moral support). Weirdest thing was the way the ushers kept scanning the congregation in case someone wasn’t being entirely acquiescent…
and then the horror when I came across the whole damn thing repeated on cable telly later that week! :-)
All I can say, Andy, is that your wife must be one in a million! (I couldn’t guess which one. ;))
Andy I sympathise with you,the horror of having to suffer a christian service!I bet those ushers had brass knuckles and clubs hidden under their robes to deal with closet atheists!and what about those sinister hymns and prayers?
Richard,
I applaud your regular and vociferous insistence upon your right to parade your ignorance in public.
But as I’ve said previously elsewhere, I’m not entering into any discussions/debates with you, for reasons that have, also, been listed before, and are too tedious to bear repetition.