Good people here, bad people there
Shiraz Maher escaped from Hizb ut-Tahrir
.
Islamism transcends cultural norms, so it not only prompted me to reject my British identity but also my ethnic South Asian background. I was neither eastern, nor western; I was a Muslim, a part of the global ummah, where identity is defined through the fraternity of faith. Islamists insist this identity is not racist because Islam welcomes people of all colours, ethnicities and backgrounds. That was true, but our world view was still horribly bipolar. We didn’t distinguish on the basis of colour, but on creed. The world was simply divided into believers and nonbelievers.
Identity defined through the ‘fraternity of faith’ is not racist, good, but it does divide the world simply into believers and nonbelievers (or infidels, kufr, apostates, heretics, misbelievers, traitors), which is at least as bad. Dividing the world into just two is both dangerous and malevolent for an obvious reason: it means that the not-us part is seen as The Enemy. That potential always exists for any kind of evaluation or preference or allegiance, but it’s a lot weaker when the allegiances are multiple instead of single. Beware the people who divide the world in two.
An excellent article. Though an atheist myself (really, and on this website of all places….) I think its actually quite politically useful that Maher remains a Muslim – that the likes of Hizb Ut-Tahrir can’t simply say he’s a godless heathen.
(Well, they undoubtedly will say that, but his message might carry more weight with those Muslims who are not Islamists, but perhaps have *some* ill-defined sympathy for the movement*, as a result)
Off topic, I recommend
The religious state of Islamic science
Turkish-American physicist Taner Edis explains why science in Muslim lands remains stuck in the past — and why the Golden Age of Mesopotamia wasn’t so golden after all.
By Steve Paulson
http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2007/08/13/taner_edis/index_np.html