Seyran Ates is Staying
Stewart translated an article about Seyran Ates’s change of mind for us, because there is no news in English yet. The article is in Neues Deutschland, by Peter Kirschey. I’ll paraphrase some and quote some, so as not to ride roughshod over copyright.
‘…the German-Turkish women’s rights activist Seyran Ates will continue to be active as a lawyer in Berlin. A week ago she said that she could no longer stand the ceaseless threats from violent ex-husbands of her clients. Therefore she was giving up her right to practice law.’ But parties, women’s organisations and fellow lawyers have expressed solidarity with her, and now they have to act. ‘First and foremost the Turkish associations and organisations must rise to the challenge of permitting her to receive the support she requires for the responsible task of defending oppressed and afflicted women.’ That can’t mean bodyguards or 24 hour protection from enraged ‘men of honour’. ‘This has to do with a climate in which violence within families will not be tolerated as a god-given right, nor macho posturings as gentlemanly delinquency. A civilised society is poor without people like Seyran Ates. Good that she let herself be talked out of it.’
Yeah; very good. Many thanks, Stewart.
I’d like to propose an amendment to our laws which would make “honour” killing a greater offence, since there is no way of defending the action rationally, hence there can be no reasonable mitigating factors.
If all they can fall back on is “Our culture tells us to defend our ‘honour’ in ways that the invisible, unprovable deity of choice has commanded. Well, according to our senior supernaturalists, anyway.”, then that’s the most pathetic version of “I was only following orders” I’ve ever heard.