Virtue Trounces Vice Again
This is funny. I know, I shouldn’t laugh, it’s serious, but it’s funny.
A statement that has warned against the dangers of allowing women to drive in Saudi Arabia was released on the Internet on Friday…It said the enemies of Islam have portrayed the image of Muslim women being without rights and having “a broken wing,” saying that their homes are prisons, their husbands mistreat them, and their hijabs are a sign of backwardness. It said that they have come up with the terminology of “injustice for women” in our country and have used it in the media lately introducing the fact that they are not allowed to drive as a sign of injustice.
They did? Those bastards. How can they say a thing like that? How can they possibly get from the fact that women are not ‘allowed’ to drive in Saudi Arabia to the ‘image’ that those women don’t have rights? It’s insane! I’m sure if men were not ‘allowed’ to drive in Saudia Arabia while women were, no one would suggest that men were without rights as a result. And would they see that as a sign of injustice? Of course not!
The statement added that though it acknowledged that foreign drivers are an economic burden on the country, their presence does less damage than the economic burdens of allowing women to drive which are: The multi-ownership of cars in one family instead of just one being used by the driver; the replacement of a car by another one since women are known to like everything new and the burden of the government having to open special female sections in all Traffic Departments.
These guys should do stand-up, I mean it. ‘Women are known to like everything new’ – why those miserable lazy greedy gold-digging whores! No wonder they’re not allowed to drive – the empty-headed materialistic demanding cows. It’s quite true, too – I’m a woman and I buy a new car once a week, and as for my clothes – ! I’ve had to have a fourth closet built to hold them all. Obviously, because I’m a woman, see, and women are known to like everything new.
But the thing about the special female sections in all Traffic Departments is the clincher, of course. That would be a budget-buster, wouldn’t it, so obviously women have to be locked up to avoid that. The US is a rich country, so it can afford that kind of thing – special women’s buses, women’s supermarkets, women’s libraries, women’s post offices, women’s Starbuck’s, women’s Office Depots – all staffed by women, all equipped with special guy-catcher prongs in the doorway. It adds up, that kind of money.
It concluded by saying that no Islamic scholar or good figure in society has called for women to drive and that all those who have been calling for them to drive are people who tend to damage the image of Islamic women. One of the signatories, Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ghamdi, head of the Commission of the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice in Al-Mikhwah in Al-Baha region, said a group of righteous people approached him and other sheikhs in the region to include their signature to the statement. “They showed us the statement and we read it and agreed with its contents. That is why we signed it,” he said.
Well, that explains that. Good to know that virtue is thriving over there.
Are you sure that the article is not meant to be humourous?
The same edition of “Arab News” has, in its Opinion section, a piece entitled “Women in the Driving Seat.” It is, of course, a report from a correspondent in Sweden…
My apologies. That post was premature. By premature, I mean I submitted it before I encountered the “Local Press” item (still in the same edition) that begins:
“We are all to blame for the continuing carnage on our streets and highways. The government entity entrusted with ensuring that stray camels wear laminated belts to warn motorists at night is to blame for the deaths of thousands of innocent drivers and passengers who collide with the unseen camels. The regulation that camels should wear laminated belts is of course not enforced.”
“Sheikh Muhammad Al-Ghamdi, head of the Commission of the Promotion of Virtue…said a group of righteous people approached him…”
What I want to know is how you recognise these “righteous people”? Do they wear special clothing? Is there a secret sign? Is it stamped on their forehead?
I suppose “righteous people” could just be “those who agree with me”…no…?
Yeah, I wondered the same thing. There you are, standing around, minding your own business, and suddenly you look up and see approaching down the street – a group of righteous people, heading your way!
Sounds terrifying, dunnit.
Said best, I’m going to link to this.
Here is the link mentioned above
ooops. That didn’t work either.
http://www.farahssowaleef.blogspot.com
Thanks Chris, and Farooha. Very interesting blog!
Head of the Commission of the Promotion of Vitue and Prevention of Vice. Damn, I want that job. Or as Oscar Wilde said,’Mother and I are starting a society for the supression of virtue.’