Don’t Forget the Face in the Tortilla
Right, that does it – a post I’ve just read at Pharyngula has goaded me into doing the post I’ve been meaning to do for a couple of days.
It’s time for a look at credulity and superstition and general soft-headedness in the Mass Media and popular culture.
Here is the Pharyngula post. About a story on MSNBC (hey if it’s partly owned by Microsoft shouldn’t it be all full of rationalist geeky types who would throw heavy rocks at anyone who suggested such a story? No? Why not?) about a ‘legendary Roman stone’ that gets soggy when a pope is about to snuff it that is currently dry therefore the stone ‘says pope will live.’
My item is yesterday’s Front Row, in which Kirstie Lang talks to a sculptor about a ‘curse’ on Carlisle which his sculpture is supposed by some Carlisle councillors to have re-activated. She says something to the effect that one has to be sympathetic, or one sees why they’re worried, or some such. Carlisle has had terrible luck lately, she says earnestly and with her usual irritating over-emphasis; rain, floods. So what? said the sculptor impatiently, you could say the same about the southwest; Devon’s had rain – Yes said Lang but they don’t have that curse.
Duh!!
Jesus H Christ almighty, I remarked pleasantly as I threw a chair through the window. Is that the sort of reasoning skill they teach you at BBC school?
But then to end on a cheerier note. I found this refreshing. (Man, how we clutch at straws in these woolly days.) On CSI, Grissom said about the horrible supervisor guy Eckley, ‘Eckley doesn’t have a scientific bone in his body. He decides what answers he wants and then he asks the questions to get them.’
Yeah! That’s telling ’em. The higher authorities should put Grissom in charge of the BBC and MSNBC.
When did our news media begin their slide into credulity and spinelessness re superstitious beliefs? I can remember as far back as the early Seventies, when Chariots of the Gods appeared and was given respectful treatment. But things do seem to have been getting worse lately. Anyone know offhand how Velikovsky’s demented rubbish was treated by the mainstream news media when it first appeared? When did reputable major dailies start running horoscope columns? Just curious.
Good question. The 70s? With the dawning of the Age of Aquarius, sort of thing?
Googled and found that popular interest in astrology took off in 1930, when Princess Margaret was born. The London Sunday Express printed an astrological profile of the royal infant and this soon turned into a popular weekly column. Bloody Brits again!
And not only bloody Brits but bloody monarchy. Charles and alternative meds and alternative ‘cancer cures’, Diana and her nonsense about being a heart person not a head person (which is just dressing up pig-ignorance as a virtue). They’ve done a fair bit of cognitive damage between them, I bet.
The rain in Devon is, no doubt, the result of global warming (a modern superstition)…
Well of course Princess Di was a heart person. She was a Gemini, after all. Duh. Don’t you know anything about astrology, Ophelia?
At least there’s actual evidence that global warming exists, Keith. Whether it’s responsible for the rain in Devon is another matter.
Perhaps global warming is responsible for Legendary Stone Dryness.
Would a wet stone would put the Pope in peril?
I think a simple test of this theory involving wetting the stone is in order.
I volunteer. ;)
twi! Good to see you!
Off you go then: off to Rome to dribble some Dr Pepper on the stone.
“At least there’s actual evidence that global warming exists, Keith. Whether it’s responsible for the rain in Devon is another matter.”
But browse through reports of weather anomolies in the media. You will find that many (if not most) — regardless of their nature (more rain, less rain, hotter, colder) — are interpreted as evidence of global warming.
I’ve even seen something like this (I have to paraphrase because I don’t have the original): “It may get wetter, it may get drier. That doesn’t matter, it all shows how humans have messed up the environment.” This was from a spokeperson for an environmental group.
Yeah, it’s amazing how these “spokespersons” don’t know diddly about the things they’re supposed to know diddly about. Very often they’re just PR types hired simply because they have a degree in marketing. You’ll find this going on in almost every field.
And it gets better : http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/press_releases/20021009115106.html
Apparently the UN wants “climate stability”, a modern take on King Canute trying to turn back the waves
Hoo-boy. I think we’ve picked the wrong planet for that idea.
So the stone wetting experiment concludes. Now they will have to elect someone else to talk to God, sorry about that. (zzzip!)