Another psyops manual
Look behind the curtain, see how they plot the manipulation.
It’s all about them there “effective opening values” – which turn out to be the inevitable banal “freedom to be ourselves” – which in fact is not any kind of progressive (let alone left-wing) value at all but sheer narcissism.
Also, it’s funny how they say “a race class gender narrative” but then go on to ignore class entirely…as they always always do. Class just doesn’t have the glamour of race n gender, and it doesn’t offer the same opportunities for bullying women. Mention class at the outset and then ignore it entirely in the substance.
Everyone always judges me on the basis of how I look! I have light skin, but they don’t realize that I’m actually a BIPOC inside. A quick reminder: Don’t assume that some has white privilege just because xey have light skin.
That they have to resort to such rhetorical ploys to avoid acknowledging inconvenient truths about sex and sport is necessary when the claim – that cannot be questioned, ever – is that Trans Women Are Women.
They’ve got to, because they’re not winning the war on women’s sports in the minds of the public; they only card they’ve got to play is to try to get people to shut up about it. Once the “live and let live” type of normies find out what transwomen in women’s sports means they absolutely hate it (as they should).
@GW – Since moving from Adelaide to rural Waikerie, my skin has become so dark perhaps I can now “identify” as a POC. No doubt, when winter comes I will return to my paler skin and resume my whitefella ideniddy. :-)
Skin colour is not immutabe, it exists on a spectrum, therefore race is not immutable, it exist on a spectrum. Rachel Dolezal was RIGHT!!
“Most of us chafe against the stereotypes and narrow expectations others project on us. Positioning this limitation in contrast to the core value of freedom to be ourselves helps energize base respondents.”
And this is where the signal gets crossed. They claim to resolve this social ill, but by basing their ideology on stereotypes, they are reinforcing it. How can one “know” they are a female mind inhabiting a male body except by reflecting on the stereotypes? Now that I’ve peaked, it’s transparent. But for those who have not peaked yet, this solution to change the “gender ID” makes perfect sense, since gender has been used interchangeably with sex for so many years.
There’s some good reading here from the Marquette Law Review. Granted, it’s actual reading without splashy graphics, but I think it does help counter some of the muddled BS in this lobbying document:
https://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5461&context=mulr
It is US-based of course, so legal case cites will reflect that, but the concepts are universal.