The woman targeted
Lesbians not welcome on Baltimore’s LGBTQ Commission’s Law and Policy Committee:
The Baltimore LGBTQ Commission’s Law and Policy Committee recently held an emergency meeting aimed at eliminating lesbian representation on the Commission. Several women who are longtime residents of the region attended on the evening of December 4, 2018, to support the woman targeted by the meeting, twenty-five year-old Julia Beck. Julia has stated that her reasons for seeking this advisory role are unequivocally and unapologetically woman-centered: “I joined Baltimore’s LGBTQ Commission to represent lesbians in local government,” and to “defend the rights of lesbians as homosexual women.” Julia is the only lesbian on the Law and Policy Committee, and possibly the only woman on the entire Commission willing to publicly state that lesbians are female homosexuals.
As the meeting progressed, however, it quickly became clear that anyone who expresses this view is explicitly unwelcome on Baltimore’s LGBTQ Commission. Although the question of Julia’s role on the Commission is not yet resolved, the writing is on the wall: women who love women might be entitled to representation on the Mayor’s LGBTQ Commission, but only if they pledge adherence to the belief that males have a right to define themselves as “lesbian” and as “women” for all legal and policy purposes.
In which case maybe women who love women would not be entitled to representation on the Mayor’s LGBTQ Commission after all because there was already representation, in the form of men who define themselves as women and lesbians. Head they win tails you lose.
The emergency meeting was scheduled in reaction to Julia’s views about policing and detention policies for women and trans-identified males. Julia had expressed the view that trans-identified males in correctional facilities deserve a safe separate space away from the general population, but that they should not have the right to be incarcerated in women’s facilities (where women may be forced to shower and sleep with them), or to force a guard who is a woman to handle their male genitals in a strip-search. In the meeting she reiterated this position, citing the horrific case of Karen White, an admitted rapist and trans-identified male who was allowed by UK prison authorities to be housed in a women’s prison based on his self-declared “gender identity,” then harassed, intimidated, and sexually assaulted several vulnerable women.
Who initiated the move to push Julia out?
Ava Pipitone, a male trans activist who dates women and identifies as a “female,” “lesbian,” and “transbutch.”
Transbutch. Transbutch. But if you’re “transbutch” then…you’re just a guy. Being female or male isn’t a style or color preference, it’s just a fact.
The nice butch lady who wants to push the one lesbian on the LGBTQ Commission out:
Ava claimed that “trans-inclusion” does not hold back women’s liberation, but at no point did Ava acknowledge that the female bodies of incarcerated women make them vulnerable to rape and violation of bodily privacy when forced to be in intimate settings with male prisoners. In fact Ava refused to acknowledge that females have any distinct interests worthy of consideration. Instead, Ava simply erased those distinct interests by declaring that males who self-identify as “women” and “female” must be treated as such for every conceivable purpose—even sexual orientation.
Women are being pushed out and shut up everywhere we look.
Again it makes me wonder how the trans lobby get so powerful so fast. I almost wonder if it isn’t societal guilt over taking so long to accept gay people, which in retrospect seems foolish. Maybe people don’t want to end up on the wrong side of history again, so they’re rushing to accept any other movement that semi-plausibly seems like it could win out in the end.
With respect to this issue, people on a commission should be allowed to have different opinions, even on some controversial issues. What’s the point of having a commission if everyone’s opinion has to match for them to be allowed on the commission?
On this particular issue, nobody is allowed to have a differing opinion.
Oddly enough, the opinion we’re all required to have doesn’t actually stand up to much scrutiny. Hmm, I wonder if there’s a connection there….
H O L Y S H I T. They should just take the “L” out of that whole alphabet soup thing altogether. I remember thinking it was absurdly funny when Eddie Izzard once described himself in one of his routines during his drag phase (Was it a phase? Has he stopped with the make-up and heels schtick? Don’t know as I don’t really follow him) as a “male lesbian.” This guy here? Not so funny. Makes Dolezal’s claim sound almost sensible by comparison. I can’t believe the nerve of some of these people. They’ve (in some cases literally, it turns out) a lot of balls to pull off something like this. And for others to fall in line? Sheer madness. I’m not sure it’s the fear of being on the wrong side of history, because there’s still plenty of people not afraid of being on the wrong side when it comes to the rights of women, African-Americans, gays and lesbians (properly defined), immigrants, etc. I still think there’s more to it than that, or that the fear is of being targeted for abuse rather than an honest, empathetic recognition of basic rights and feedoms. They might be winning these skirmishes, but I don’t think that these extreme trans activists are doing their movement any favours in the long run.
For what it’s worth, however naive or short sighted it may be on my part, I can’t see people a few decades hence taking my statement here and using it as an example of the “bad old days” in the same manner as the writings of bigoted whites are used to show what racism was like in the past (or now, for that matter). I know some of the language might sound the same, and that nobody ever won rights by asking for them politely, but this is active overreach; conquest not co-operation, erasure not equity, replacement not restitution. If the trans extremists end up winning in the end and I am on the “wrong side”, I know I won’t be alone and I’ll be in good company. But I’m a man and less likely to suffer abuse and vilification in the meantime.
Now it seems the only ones allowed to claim the status of True Womanhood are those who courageously choose it, not those who are merely born into it.
Fuck that shit.
#1
Personally I lean a little towards it being a case of people rushing to avoid being on the wrong side of history; whatever the source of the zeal, it sure as hell switches off a lot of people’s rational thought.
And in this case, they are not asking for their rights from people who have the power to grant that. They are demanding something that is not a right from people that are, for the most part, members of an oppressed class and not the power players. They aren’t asking for rights, they’re demanding the suppression of another oppressed group, a group that is oppressed by the group they belonged to (or still belong to, depending on how the word “woman” finally gets defined).
They are also not targeting those who really threaten them, but people who agree that they deserve to be treated with human dignity and have their rights, but just don’t happen to believe they are who they say they are.
Yes, this. I knew there was something else I was missing from the comparison. Thank you.
So our newly minted “lesbian” has won this round of the little game of musical chairs he/she/they have instigated, and gets a seat at the table. Just how “representative” are they capable of being? How well can the interests both “L” and “T” be cared for, especially when those interests differ or conflict with each other. No need to wonder which way that’s going to go. The same goes for the whole “trans-cntered feminism” that is being promulgated by radical activists. How “feminist” can it truly be? How hard are Women 2.0 going to fight for abortion rights or having contraception paid for under health insurance? How much attention are they going to give to the health care, pay equity and legal rights of Women 1.0? This is a waste of time and squandering of limited resources, having to wage these definitional battles to retain or win back women’s rightful place and space everywhere.. Extreme trans activists can go “center themselves” somewhere else.
And the other thing is, why should feminist center anyone but women? Yes, feminists can root out racism where it occurs, and join with the black community to deplore and work against it, but feminism should not be about ending racism everywhere; it should regard the needs of black women and other minority women in the approach it takes, but centering race in feminism is not a good move. Centering trans women in feminism (or trans men, since we are told that they are uterus-havers and must be included in any discussion of rights for women) is not appropriate, either. We can recognize the needs of these individuals, deplore transphobia where it occurs, work with them to help achieve legitimate rights, but we should not center anyone in feminism but women. The rest should be overlapping, but peripheral, concerns on the Venn diagram.
(Straps on Kevlar body suit, channels transactivist) Well that’s bit selfish, isn’t it? (Runs like Hell)